首页> 外文期刊>Integrative cancer therapies >Concurrent sulforaphane and eugenol induces differential effects on human cervical cancer cells
【24h】

Concurrent sulforaphane and eugenol induces differential effects on human cervical cancer cells

机译:并用萝卜硫烷和丁子香酚对人宫颈癌细胞有不同的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. The concept of combination of chemoprevention holds great potential for cancer management as lower, clinically tolerable doses of individual agents could be achieved through therapeutic synergy. However, elucidation of their possible interactions-additive, synergistic, or antagonistic-must be thoroughly studied before considering for clinical use. Methods. To evaluate the effect of combination treatment of sulforaphane (SFN) and eugenol on HeLa cells, the authors performed cell viability assay, apoptosis assay, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for gene expression analysis. Calculations of combination effects were expressed as a combination index (CI) with CI < 1, CI = 1, or CI > 1 representing synergism, additivity, or antagonism, respectively. Results. Simultaneous treatment with variable dose combinations of SFN and eugenol resulted in differential effects with an antagonistic effect at lower and synergistic at higher sub-lethal doses as reflected in cell cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction. Importantly, gemcitabine used in conjunction with the low- and high-dose combinations showed no significant cell death at lower doses suggesting that cell cytotoxicity is proportional to gemcitabine alone, whereas at higher sublethal doses of SFN and eugenol, it was found to act in a synergistic manner with gemcitabine. Furthermore, SFN and eugenol combinations at synergistic dose significantly downregulated the expression of Bcl-2, COX-2 and IL-β but not the antagonistic combinations. Conclusion. This study clearly indicates that 2 (or more) chemopreventive agents can act antagonistically or synergistically necessitating elucidation of possible mechanistic interactions for favorable and reliable outcomes of dietary components in the field of cancer prevention.
机译:背景。化学预防联合的概念在癌症管理中具有巨大的潜力,因为可以通过治疗协同作用实现更低的临床耐受剂量的单个药物。但是,在考虑将其用于临床之前,必须彻底研究其可能的相互作用(加性,协同或拮抗作用)。方法。为了评估萝卜硫烷(SFN)和丁子香酚的组合处理对HeLa细胞的影响,作者进行了细胞活力测定,凋亡测定和逆转录聚合酶链反应以进行基因表达分析。组合效应的计算表示为组合指数(CI),其中CI <1,CI = 1或CI> 1分别表示协同作用,加和作用或拮抗作用。结果。 SFN和丁子香酚的可变剂量组合同时治疗可产生不同的作用,在较低的致死剂量下具有较低的拮抗作用,并在较高的亚致死剂量下具有协同作用,这反映在细胞的细胞毒性和凋亡诱导中。重要的是,吉西他滨与低剂量和高剂量组合一起使用时,在较低剂量下未显示明显的细胞死亡,这表明细胞毒性与吉西他滨单独成正比,而在亚致死剂量的SFN和丁子香酚中,它的作用却很明显。与吉西他滨协同作用。此外,SFN和丁子香酚组合在协同剂量下显着下调Bcl-2,COX-2和IL-β的表达,但对拮抗组合没有影响。结论。这项研究清楚地表明,两种(或多种)化学预防剂可以拮抗或协同作用,因此有必要阐明可能的机械相互作用,以在癌症预防领域中实现饮食成分的良好而可靠的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号