首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Endoscopic management for pancreatic injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma decreases failure of nonoperative management and incidence of pancreatic-related complications
【24h】

Endoscopic management for pancreatic injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma decreases failure of nonoperative management and incidence of pancreatic-related complications

机译:内窥镜处理腹部钝器造成的胰腺损伤减少了非手术治疗的失败和胰腺相关并发症的发生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction The actual benefit of endoscopic techniques in the non-operative management (NOM) of pancreatic injury is still unclear, with its role and effectiveness in the NOM of pancreatic injury remains defined and doubted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and long-term results of endoscopic techniques in the NOM of blunt pancreatic injury, and to determine whether NOM can be performed safely for selective patients with pancreatic injury. Patients and methods The records and follow-up data of all patients with blunt pancreatic injuries over 16-year period from October 1, 1996, to September 30, 2012 at our department were retrospectively reviewed. Failure of NOM (FNOM) occurred if laparotomy was required after attempted NOM. Results 132 patients (32% of all patients with blunt pancreatic injury) underwent NOM, including 58 who underwent endoscopic management (EM) and 74 who were observed without EM (NO-EM). FNOM of overall NOM was 20%, including 30% of NO-EM and 9% of EM. There was no significant difference in FNOM for NO-EM versus EM for grade I, however, a significant decrease in FNOM was noted with the addition of EM for grade II and III. EM was a statistically significant independent risk factor. Regular follow-up of 1 year showed that, for patients from grade I to III, 53 patients (42%) from operative management (OM) and 34 patients (46%) of the NO-EM developed various pancreatic-related complications, while only 15 patients (26%) of the EM developed such complications, and the difference was significant. Conclusion Application of strictly defined selection criteria for NOM and EM in patients with blunt pancreatic injury resulted in one of the lowest FNOM rates (9%) and pancreatic-related complications incidence (25%). Selective application of EM for hemodynamically stable patients with blunt pancreatic injury will extend the indications for, and improve success of NOM.
机译:引言内镜技术在胰腺损伤的非手术治疗(NOM)中的实际益处仍不清楚,其在胰腺损伤NOM中的作用和有效性尚不确定。这项研究的目的是评估内镜技术在钝性胰腺损伤NOM中的可行性和长期结果,并确定是否可以安全地对选择性胰腺损伤患者进行NOM。患者与方法回顾性分析了我科自1996年10月1日至2012年9月30日这16年间所有胰腺钝性损伤患者的记录和随访资料。如果尝试进行NOM后需要进行剖腹手术,则会发生NOM(FNOM)失败。结果132例患者(占所有钝性胰腺损伤患者的32%)进行了NOM,其中58例接受了内镜处理(EM),74例未进行了EM(NO-EM)。总体NOM的FNOM为20%,其中包括30%的NO-EM和9%的EM。 NO-EM的FNOM与I级的EM的FNOM没有显着差异,但是,随着II级和III级的EM的添加,发现FNOM显着下降。 EM是统计学上显着的独立危险因素。定期随访1年显示,对于I级至III级患者,手术管理(OM)的患者53例(42%),NO-EM患者的34例(46%)发生了各种胰腺相关并发症,而只有15例(26%)的EM患者出现了这种并发症,差异有统计学意义。结论严格定义的NOM和EM选择标准适用于胰腺钝性损伤,是FNOM发生率最低(9%)和胰腺相关并发症发生率(25%)之一。 EM在血液动力学稳定的钝性胰腺损伤患者中的选择性应用将扩大NOM的适应症并提高其成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号