首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >Performance Management: Process Perfection or Process Utility?
【24h】

Performance Management: Process Perfection or Process Utility?

机译:绩效管理:流程完善还是流程实用程序?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pulakos and O'Leary (2011) argue that the vast majority of organizations should not be involved in the practice of goal cascading, and they also argue against the use of SMART goals in the vast majority of work situations.Arguments against the use of these two performance management-related processes,as well as other arguments presented by Pulakos and O'Leary, we feel, are based on the assumption of process perfection.We have learned after numerous performancemanagement system implementations—and subsequently managing those implementations in several organizationsas internal industrial–organizational (1-0) professionals—that process utility should take precedence.
机译:Pulakos和O'Leary(2011)认为绝大多数组织不应该参与目标级联的实践,并且他们还反对在绝大多数工作环境中使用SMART目标。我们认为,两个与绩效管理相关的流程以及Pulakos和O'Leary提出的其他论点都是基于流程完善的假设。我们在大量绩效管理系统实施之后学到了知识,并随后在内部多个组织中管理这些实施工业-组织(1-0)专业人员-流程实用程序应该优先。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号