...
首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >Medical management of left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: critical evaluation of therapeutic trials.
【24h】

Medical management of left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis: critical evaluation of therapeutic trials.

机译:左侧溃疡性结肠炎和溃疡性直肠炎的医疗管理:治疗试验的严格评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The goal of this work was to critically evaluate the published studies on the treatment of ulcerative proctitis (UP) and left-sided ulcerative colitis (L-UC). The results of this review provided the content for the accompanying treatment guidelines, Clinical Guidelines for the Medical Management of Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis and Ulcerative Proctitis: Summary Statement. METHODS: All English language articles published between 1995 and September 2005 were identified through a comprehensive literature search using OVID and PubMed. The quality of the data supporting or rejecting the use of specific therapies was categorized by a data quality grading scale. An "A+" grade was assigned to treatment supported by multiple high-quality randomized controlled trials with consistent results, whereas a "D" grade was given to therapy supported only by expert opinion. The therapeutic efficacy of a treatment was defined by its success in treating UP and L-UC compared with placebo. A medication was rankedas "excellent" if it was specifically studied for UP and L-UC and had consistently positive results compared with placebo or another agent. Quality and efficacy scores were agreed on by author consensus. RESULTS: For the acute treatment of UP or L-UC, the rectally administered corticosteroids and mesalazine (5-ASA), either alone or in combination with oral 5-ASAs, are the most effective therapy: evidence quality, A+; efficacy, excellent. Only rectally administered 5-ASA received an A+/excellent rating for maintenance of remission. Infliximab received an A+ grade for induction and maintenance of remission but only a "good" rating because the studies were performed in all UC, not specifically UP or L-UC. CONCLUSIONS: This critical evaluation of treatment provides a "report card" on medications available for the management of patients with UP and L-UC. The guidelines should provide a useful reference and supplement for physicians treating UC patients.
机译:背景:这项工作的目的是严格评估已发表的溃疡性直肠炎(UP)和左侧溃疡性结肠炎(L-UC)的治疗研究。审查的结果提供了随附治疗指南,左侧溃疡性结肠炎和溃疡性直肠炎的医疗管理临床指南的内容:摘要声明。方法:通过使用OVID和PubMed进行全面的文献检索,确定1995年至2005年9月之间发表的所有英语文章。支持或拒绝使用特定疗法的数据质量按数据质量分级量表进行分类。将“ A +”等级分配到由多个高质量随机对照试验支持的治疗方案中,并获得一致的结果,而将“ D”等级分配给仅由专家意见支持的治疗方案。通过与安慰剂相比成功治疗UP和L-UC来定义治疗的疗效。如果专门针对UP和L-UC进行研究,并且与安慰剂或其他药物相比始终具有阳性结果,则该药物被评为“优秀”。质量和功效评分由作者达成共识。结果:对于UP或L-UC的急性治疗,单独或与口服5-ASA联合使用的皮质类固醇和美沙拉嗪(5-ASA)都是最有效的治疗方法:证据质量,A +。功效,极佳。只有经直肠给药的5-ASA维持缓解率获得A + /优秀评级。英夫利昔单抗在诱导和维持缓解方面获得A +级,但仅获得“良好”等级,因为该研究是在所有UC中进行的,并非专门针对UP或L-UC。结论:这种对治疗的关键评价为可用于治疗UP和L-UC患者的药物提供了“报告卡”。该指南应为治疗UC患者的医生提供有用的参考和补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号