...
首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >Totally laparoscopic total proctocolectomy: A safe alternative to open surgery in inflammatory bowel disease
【24h】

Totally laparoscopic total proctocolectomy: A safe alternative to open surgery in inflammatory bowel disease

机译:完全腹腔镜全结肠镜切除术:炎性肠病开放手术的安全替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have a high incidence of wound and overall postoperative complications. A totally laparoscopic approach could potentially reduce these risks. We adopted totally laparoscopic total proctocolectomy (TL-TPC) using the perineal wound for extraction as the procedure of choice in IBD patients who are not candidates for a restorative procedure. This study looks at the TLTPC results and compares them with our open cohort. Methods: Prospectively collected data from 52 consecutive patients undergoing TL-TPC from 2002 to 2010 were compared to 31 contemporary patients undergoing open TPC. Results: Demographics and patient characteristics including body mass index were similar. Mean operative times were 340 ± 7 minutes for TL-TPC and 337 ± 9 minutes for open TPC (P = 0.91). Intraoperative blood loss was 228 ± 2 mL for TL-TPC and 484 ± 3 mL for open TPC (P < 0.001). Return of bowel function measured as an ileostomy output >100 mL per 8 hours occurred at 2.7 6 2.8 days for TL-TPC versus 3.3 ± 1.8 days for open TPC (P = 0.025). The length of stay was 8.4 ± 5.0 days for TL-TPC versus 9.2 ± 3.2 days for open TPC (P = 0.05). The overall complication rate was 43% for TL-TPC versus 65% for open TPC (P = 0.07). Postoperative abdominal wound infections and parastomal hernias occurred in 23% and 10% of open TPC patients, respectively, versus zero (P = 0.001) and 6% (P = 0.67) for TL-TPC. Conclusions: TL-TPC is therefore considered a safe alternative to open surgery for selected IBD patients not candidates for a restorative procedure.
机译:背景:炎性肠病(IBD)患者的伤口和整体术后并发症的发生率很高。完全腹腔镜手术可能会降低这些风险。对于不适合进行修复手术的IBD患者,我们选择使用会阴伤口进行全腹腔镜全结肠切除术(TL-TPC)作为选择手术。这项研究着眼于TLTPC的结果,并将其与我们的开放队列进行比较。方法:将2002年至2010年连续52例接受TL-TPC的患者的前瞻性收集数据与31例接受开放TPC的当代患者进行比较。结果:人口统计学和患者特征(包括体重指数)相似。 TL-TPC的平均手术时间为340±7分钟,开放式TPC的平均手术时间为337±9分钟(P = 0.91)。 TL-TPC的术中失血量为228±2 mL,开放式TPC的术中失血量为484±3 mL(P <0.001)。 TL-TPC在回肠造口术输出量大于100 mL / 8小时测量的肠功能恢复发生在2.7 6 2.8天,而开放式TPC则为3.3±1.8天(P = 0.025)。 TL-TPC的住院时间为8.4±5.0天,而开放式TPC的住院时间为9.2±3.2天(P = 0.05)。 TL-TPC的总并发症发生率为43%,而开放式TPC的总并发症发生率为65%(P = 0.07)。开放性TPC患者中分别发生23%和10%的术后腹部伤口感染和口腔旁疝,而TL-TPC分别为零(P = 0.001)和6%(P = 0.67)。结论:因此,对于选择的IBD患者而不是恢复性手术的候选人,TL-TPC被认为是开放手术的安全替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号