首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Crops and Products >Evaluation of properties of bast fiber extracted from Calotropis (Millkweed) by a new decorticator machine and manual methods
【24h】

Evaluation of properties of bast fiber extracted from Calotropis (Millkweed) by a new decorticator machine and manual methods

机译:用新型除胶机和人工方法评价从Calotropis(Millkweed)提取的韧皮纤维的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The majority of plant fibers which are being considered as reinforcements for polymeric composite are bast fibers. Calotropis bast fiber is one of these types that has been extracted manually up to now. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of new decorticator machine on some properties of extracted fiber and compare with separated fibers manually. The mentioned decorticator machine was able to extract bast fiber without shattering stems and flowing latex. Some studied properties were morphological characterize, tensile properties (tensile strength, Young's modulus and strain) and density of fiber. The results indicated that machinery extraction method had no significant effect on the fiber morphology. This means that the decorticator machine did not cause serious mechanical damage on the morphology of fiber, instead the cell length increased in decorticated bast fiber. Also a significant increase (P = 0.01) was observed in the bundle lengths for fibers decorticated by the machine. Regarding tensile strength, the decorticated bast fibers show highest tensile strength (350.73 MPa) in comparison with the strength of extracted fibers manually (254.56 MPa). Also, it is shown that there is no significant difference between densities in two extraction methods. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:被认为是聚合物复合材料增强材料的大多数植物纤维是韧皮纤维。 Calotropis韧皮纤维是迄今为止已被手动提取的这些类型之一。这项研究的目的是研究新型脱胶机对提取纤维的某些性能的影响,并与分离的纤维进行人工比较。提到的脱胶机能够提取韧皮纤维,而不会粉碎茎干和流动的胶乳。研究的一些性能包括形态特征,拉伸性能(拉伸强度,杨氏模量和应变)和纤维密度。结果表明,机械提取方法对纤维形态无明显影响。这意味着去皮机不会对纤维的形态造成严重的机械损伤,而是去皮的韧皮纤维的泡孔长度增加了。对于通过机器脱皮的纤维,在束长中也观察到显着增加(P <= 0.01)。关于拉伸强度,与手工提取的纤维的强度(254.56 MPa)相比,脱皮的韧皮纤维显示出最高的拉伸强度(350.73 MPa)。而且,表明两种提取方法的密度之间没有显着差异。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号