首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of pediatrics >Performance of PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) score and PIM (Pediatric Index of Mortality) score in a tertiary care pediatric ICU.
【24h】

Performance of PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) score and PIM (Pediatric Index of Mortality) score in a tertiary care pediatric ICU.

机译:三重医疗儿科ICU中PRISM(儿童死亡风险)评分和PIM(儿童死亡指数)评分的表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To validate Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) score. METHODS: All consecutive patients over a six month period were included in the study except patients with a PICU stay of less than 2 hours, those transferred to other PICUs, pediatric surgical cases, trauma patients and those dying within 24 hours of admission. The PRISM and PIM scores of all patients included in the study were computed and the outcome was noted in terms of survival or non-survival. Mortality discrimination was quantified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to calibrate the scores. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty patients were enrolled with mean age of 40.6 months and male to female ratio of 1.2:1. There were 56 deaths (mortality rate 24.3%). The mortality in infants was higher (37.8 %) as compared to non-infants (16.2 %) (p = 0.011). The predicted deaths with PRISM score was 24.3%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.851 (95% CI 0.790-0.912). The Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed good calibration (p = 0.627, chi square = 1.75, degree of freedom = 3). The predicted deaths with the PIM score was 7.38%. The area under the ROC curve for PIM score was 0.838 (95 % CI 0.776-0.899). The Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit showed a poor calibration for PIM score (p = 0.0281, chi-square = 10.866, degree of freedom = 4). CONCLUSION: Both PRISM and PIM scores have a good discriminatory performance. The calibration with PRISM score is good but the PIM score displays poor calibration.
机译:目的:验证儿童死亡风险(PRISM)和儿童死亡指数(PIM)评分。方法:研究纳入了六个月期间的所有连续患者,但PICU住院时间少于2小时的患者,转移至其他PICU的患者,儿科手术病例,创伤患者以及入院24小时内死亡的患者。计算纳入研究的所有患者的PRISM和PIM得分,并根据存活率或非存活率记录结局。通过计算接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线下的面积来量化死亡率歧视。使用Hosmer和Lemeshow拟合优度检验来校准分数。结果:230例患者入组,平均年龄为40.6个月,男女之比为1.2:1。有56人死亡(死亡率24.3%)。与非婴儿(16.2%)相比,婴儿的死亡率(37.8%)更高(p = 0.011)。 PRISM评分预测的死亡人数为24.3%。 ROC曲线下的面积为0.851(95%CI 0.790-0.912)。 Hosmer和Lemeshow拟合优度测试显示出良好的校准性(p = 0.627,卡方= 1.75,自由度= 3)。 PIM分数预测的死亡人数为7.38%。 PIM评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.838(95%CI 0.776-0.899)。 Hosmer和Lemeshow拟合优度显示PIM得分校正较差(p = 0.0281,卡方= 10.866,自由度= 4)。结论:PRISM和PIM评分均具有良好的歧视性表现。 PRISM评分的校准效果很好,但PIM评分显示的校准效果很差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号