首页> 外文期刊>Annals of clinical biochemistry. >Evaluation of the Abbott IMx fluorescence polarization immunoassay and the bio-rad enzyme immunoassay for homocysteine: comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography.
【24h】

Evaluation of the Abbott IMx fluorescence polarization immunoassay and the bio-rad enzyme immunoassay for homocysteine: comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography.

机译:高纯半胱氨酸的Abbott IMx荧光偏振免疫分析和bio-rad酶免疫分析的评估:与高效液相色谱法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We evaluated the precision, linearity and accuracy of the Abbott IMx and Bio-Rad (Axis) homocysteine assays. Both assays make use of S-adenosyl-homocysteine hydrolase and excess adenosine, to convert homocysteine to S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). A monoclonal anti-SAH antibody is then used to quantify SAH. The IMx assay measures the fluorescence polarization of a conjugated SAH analogue for the final analytical step, whereas the Bio-Rad method uses a microplate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) employing an anti-mouse antibody peroxidase conjugate. The Abbott procedure is completely automated whereas the Bio-Rad EIA is performed manually. Between-run coefficient of variation using commercial controls was 2.6% at 7 micromol/L, 2.5% at 13 micromol/L and 1.7% at 24 micromol/L for the Abbott method, and 19.7% at 6.4 micromol/L, 15.9% at 11.0 micromol/L and 14.5% at 23.4 micromol/L for the Bio-Rad method. Both assays correlated well with a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure for homocysteine: Bio-Rad EIA = 1.03HPLC + 1.0 micromol/L, r=0.98, s(y/x)=0.51; Abbott IMx = 1.02HPLC + 0.7 micromol/L, r=0.99, s(y/x) = 0.33. Both methods were linear up to 50 micromol/L homocysteine. The IMx assay had superior precision as well as the technological advantage of being completely automated. Both immunoassays exhibited greatly improved throughput compared with our existing HPLC method.
机译:我们评估了Abbott IMx和Bio-Rad(Axis)同型半胱氨酸测定的精密度,线性和准确性。两种测定法均利用S-腺苷-高半胱氨酸水解酶和过量的腺苷将高半胱氨酸转化为S-腺苷-高半胱氨酸(SAH)。然后使用单克隆抗SAH抗体定量SAH。 IMx分析可在最后的分析步骤中测量缀合的SAH类似物的荧光偏振,而Bio-Rad方法使用微板酶免疫分析(EIA),其采用抗小鼠抗体过氧化物酶缀合物。 Abbott程序是完全自动化的,而Bio-Rad EIA是手动执行的。使用商业对照的批次间变异系数,对于Abbott方法,在7 micromol / L下为2.6%,在13 micromol / L下为2.5%,在24 micromol / L下为1.7%,在6.4 micromol / L下为19.7%,在6.4 micromol / L下为15.9%对于Bio-Rad方法,为11.0 micromol / L,在23.4 micromol / L下为14.5%。两种测定均与同型半胱氨酸的高效液相色谱(HPLC)程序密切相关:Bio-Rad EIA = 1.03HPLC + 1.0 micromol / L,r = 0.98,s(y / x)= 0.51;雅培IMx = 1.02HPLC + 0.7 micromol / L,r = 0.99,s(y / x)= 0.33。两种方法都是线性的,最高至50 micromol / L高半胱氨酸。 IMx分析具有卓越的精度以及完全自动化的技术优势。与我们现有的HPLC方法相比,两种免疫测定均显示出大大提高的通量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号