...
首页> 外文期刊>In vivo. >Evaluation of early dynamic splinting versus static splinting for patients with transposition of the extensor carpi radialis longus to the extensor pollicis longus.
【24h】

Evaluation of early dynamic splinting versus static splinting for patients with transposition of the extensor carpi radialis longus to the extensor pollicis longus.

机译:评估早期动态夹板与静态夹板将patients腕腕伸肌移位至腕长肌伸肌的患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present a group of 20 patients who underwent transposition of the extensor carpi radialis longus to the extensor pollicis longus between April 2003 and September 2007. The group was divided into ten patients with an early dynamic splint and ten patients with a static plaster cast following the standard rehabilitation protocols. We compared these two rehabilitation protocols. The post-rehabilitation total range of motion was 87.5 degrees in the dynamic group and 58.75 degrees in the patients treated by the static protocol. The total time of rehabilitation was 10.2 weeks in the dynamic and 14.2 weeks in the static group. The overall mean follow-up was 12.2 weeks. We conclude that early dynamic splinting brings shorter recovery time, shorter time off work and significantly better movement of the thumb.
机译:我们介绍了一组20例患者,这些患者在2003年4月至2007年9月之间接受了radial侧伸腕向长弓突的移位。该小组分为10例有早期动态夹板的患者和10例有静态石膏板的患者。标准康复方案。我们比较了这两种康复方案。康复组的动态范围在动态组中为87.5度,在通过静态方案治疗的患者中为58.75度。动态组的总康复时间为10.2周,静态组为14.2周。总体平均随访时间为12.2周。我们得出的结论是,早期的动态夹板可缩短恢复时间,缩短下班时间,并显着改善拇指运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号