首页> 外文期刊>Biocontrol Science and Technology >Effects of chemical control agents and microbial biocontrol agents on numbers of non-target microbial soil organisms: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Effects of chemical control agents and microbial biocontrol agents on numbers of non-target microbial soil organisms: a meta-analysis.

机译:化学控制剂和微生物生物控制剂对非目标微生物土壤生物数量的影响:荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our aim was to investigate the non-target effects on soil micro-organisms in agricultural environments caused by chemical control agents (CCAs) and microbial biocontrol agents (mBCAs), including the recovery from these effects. This was a desk study in which quantifiable endpoints, such as numbers of colony forming units (CFU), were derived from a series of studies and the combined data then analysed with a meta-regression analysis. Three analyses of the same dataset were performed. The first analysis, which was performed at the level of the CCAs and mBCAs in general, revealed that the effects of CCAs differed significantly from those of mBCAs. The second analysis, which included the type of non-target group (bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and protozoa) as additional input, revealed that mBCAs have greater effects than CCAs on fungi at study initiation, that CCAs had greater effects than mBCAs on bacteria and protozoa and that when effects were measured, recovery occurred within 100 days post-treatment initiation. The final analysis, which included the type of CCA (fungicide, insecticide, herbicide) or mBCA (antagonist) as additional input, revealed that (1) antagonists had a greater effect on fungi than insecticides and fungicides, (2) insecticides and to a lesser extent fungicides had a larger effect on bacteria than fungicides and antagonists, and (3) recovery of the CFU occurred within 100 days for all types of pesticides, mBCAs as well as CCAs, and for all non-target groups. The findings are discussed in view of the regulatory context of admittance of mBCAs to the market.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2011.594952
机译:我们的目的是研究化学控制剂(CCA)和微生物生物控制剂(mBCA)对农业环境中土壤微生物的非目标作用,包括从这些作用中恢复的作用。这是一项案头研究,其中可量化的终点(例如菌落形成单位(CFU)的数量)是从一系列研究中得出的,然后使用荟萃回归分析对合并后的数据进行分析。对同一数据集进行了三个分析。通常在CCA和mBCAs级别上进行的第一个分析显示,CCA的效果与mBCA的效果显着不同。第二项分析包括非目标人群的类型(细菌,真菌,放线菌和原生动物)作为额外输入,该研究表明,在研究开始时,mBCA对真菌的影响要比CCA大,而CCA对细菌的影响要大于mBCA。和原生动物,并且在测量效果时,在治疗开始后100天内恢复。最终分析包括CCA(杀菌剂,杀虫剂,除草剂)或mBCA(拮抗剂)的类型作为附加投入,结果表明(1)拮抗剂对真菌的作用要大于杀虫剂和杀真菌剂,(2)杀虫剂和较小程度的杀菌剂比杀菌剂和拮抗剂对细菌的影响更大;(3)所有类型的农药,mBCA和CCA以及所有非目标人群的CFU回收均在100天内发生。鉴于mBCA进入市场的监管背景,对研究结果进行了讨论。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2011.594952

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号