首页> 外文期刊>IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors >Recovering Time or Chasing Rainbows? Exploring Time Perception, Conceptualization of Time Recovery, and Time Pressure Mitigation in Train Driving
【24h】

Recovering Time or Chasing Rainbows? Exploring Time Perception, Conceptualization of Time Recovery, and Time Pressure Mitigation in Train Driving

机译:恢复时间还是追逐彩虹?探索列车驾驶中的时间感知,时间恢复的概念化和时间压力缓解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: A signal passed at danger happens when a train passes a rail signal set to a stop indication and encroaches into a railway where it does not have authority to be. In this respect, it is rather like a car going through a red light. Signal passed at danger events continue to impact safety-risk on railways, despite the introduction of technologies aimed at addressing their cause and effect. Previous work has identified time pressure and certain aspects of the way train drivers (Locomotive Engineers) and controllers (Dispatchers) interact as key risk factors. Exposure to these could give rise to distraction and/or inattention from safe driving, distort service delivery requirements, and fundamentally alter the driver's perception of risk. Purpose: This study undertook a new and more specialized analysis of existing data to investigate how drivers perceived time and conceptualized its loss and recovery within their driving task, and how they mitigated time pressure. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with train drivers from eight urban passenger rail organizations across Australia and New Zealand using a generative scenario simulation task. Results: Drivers had varying perspectives of time, either as a fixed aspect of the task, or as something that was uncontrollable. However, every driver perceived time as an aspect of the task that was being patrolled. Time pressure mitigation strategies associated with reprioritizing tasks and molding time were identified, both of which had specific relationships with other themes. A conceptual model is given integrating the findings of this study to previous work. Conclusions: Train drivers have diverse perspectives of the time requirement of their task, which influences their understanding of time loss and recovery. While some strategies to mitigate time pressure aim to reprioritize sub-tasks, others aim to remove time requirements from service delivery goals altogether. The three time-related themes and related mitigated strategies were novel to the study conducted and reported in this article.
机译:背景:当火车通过设置为停车指示的铁路信号并侵入其无权进入的铁路时,就会发生危险信号。在这方面,它就像一辆汽车正在闯红灯。尽管引入了旨在解决其因果关系的技术,但在危险事件中传递的信号仍继续影响铁路上的安全风险。先前的工作已经确定了时间压力以及火车驾驶员(机车工程师)和控制器(调度员)交互的方式的某些方面是关键风险因素。暴露在这些环境中可能会导致分心和/或疏于安全驾驶,扭曲服务提供要求,并从根本上改变驾驶员对风险的感知。目的:本研究对现有数据进行了新的,更专业的分析,以调查驾驶员在驾驶任务中如何感知时间并概念化时间损失和恢复,以及他们如何减轻时间压力。方法:使用生成的情景模拟任务,与来自澳大利亚和新西兰的八个城市客运铁路组织的火车司​​机进行了焦点小组讨论。结果:驾驶员对时间有不同的看法,无论是作为任务的固定方面还是无法控制的事情。但是,每个驾驶员都将时间视为正在巡逻的任务的一个方面。确定了与重新分配任务优先级和成型时间相关的时间压力缓解策略,这两种策略均与其他主题具有特定关系。给出了一个概念模型,将本研究的发现与以前的工作相结合。结论:火车驾驶员对任务的时间要求有不同的看法,这影响了他们对时间损失和恢复的理解。虽然一些缓解时间压力的策略旨在重新安排子任务的优先级,但其他策略则旨在从服务交付目标中完全消除时间要求。这三个与时间相关的主题和相关的缓解策略对于本文进行和报道的研究是新颖的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号