首页> 外文期刊>Immunotherapy >Clinical development of combination strategies in immunotherapy: are we ready for more than one investigational product in an early clinical trial?
【24h】

Clinical development of combination strategies in immunotherapy: are we ready for more than one investigational product in an early clinical trial?

机译:免疫疗法联合策略的临床开发:我们是否准备在早期的临床试验中使用多个研究产品?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Stimulating the innate and adaptive immunity against cancer necessitates the tricking of a system evolved to fight microbial pathogens and directing its activity towards transformed self-tissue. Efficacious interventions to start and sustain the response will probably require a number of agents to tamper simultaneously or sequentially with several immune mechanisms. Although master switches controlling various functions may exist, the goal of a curative immune response will probably demand the combined actions of several therapeutic components. Synergy occurs when drugs interact in ways that enhance or magnify one or more effects or side effects. In cancer immunotherapy, two agents that have minor or no therapeutic effects as single agents can be powerful when combined. Mouse experimentation provides multiple examples of synergistic combinations. Elements to be combined include chiefly: tumor vaccines, adoptive T-cell therapies, cytokines, costimulatory molecules, molecular deactivation of immunosuppressive ortolerogenic pathways and immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies. These novel therapies, even as single agents, are extremely complex products to be developed owing to the associated biomolecules, cell therapies or gene therapies. At present, drug-development programs are run individually for each immunotherapeutic agent and combinations are considered only at a later stage in clinical development, even in the absence of formal compulsory regulations to prevent clinical trials with combinations. As a result, instead of the search for maximal efficacy, ease of combination with standard treatments, intellectual property management, regulations and business-based decisions often guide the way. Even though the maximal effort must be made in order to prevent adverse effects in patients, it seems reasonable that combination pilot trials should be performed at an early stage, following safe completion of Phase I trials. These trials should be performed based on evidence for synergy in animal models and be simplified in terms of regulatory requirements. Such 'short-cut' combination immunotherapy trials can bring much needed efficacy earlier to the bedside.
机译:刺激对癌症的先天性和适应性免疫,就需要欺骗一种系统来对抗微生物病原体,并将其活性引向转化后的自身组织。开始和维持反应的有效干预可能会需要多种药物同时或依次干扰几种免疫机制。尽管可能存在控制各种功能的主开关,但治愈性免疫应答的目标可能需要几种治疗成分的联合作用。当药物以增强或放大一种或多种作用或副作用的方式相互作用时,就会发生协同作用。在癌症免疫疗法中,两种药物作为单一药物的作用不大或没有疗效,将两种药物合用时可能很有效。小鼠实验提供了多个协同组合的例子。要组合的要素主要包括:肿瘤疫苗,过继性T细胞疗法,细胞因子,共刺激分子,免疫抑制性致睾途径和免疫刺激性单克隆抗体的分子失活。这些新的疗法,甚至作为单一药物,由于相关的生物分子,细胞疗法或基因疗法而成为非常复杂的产品。目前,针对每种免疫治疗剂的药物开发计划都是单独运行的,并且即使在没有正式的强制性法规来阻止联合使用的临床试验的情况下,也只能在临床开发的后期才考虑联合使用。结果,与其寻求最大功效,不如将其与标准疗法,知识产权管理,法规和基于业务的决策相结合,通常可以指导这种方法。即使必须尽最大的努力来防止患者出现不良反应,但在安全完成I期临床试验后应在早期进行联合中试试验似乎是合理的。这些试验应基于动物模型中协同作用的证据进行,并应根据法规要求进行简化。这种“捷径”组合免疫疗法试验可以更早地在床边带来急需的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号