首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Plastic Surgery >Annals of plastic surgery adopts and recommends the SAMPL guidelines for statistical analyses
【24h】

Annals of plastic surgery adopts and recommends the SAMPL guidelines for statistical analyses

机译:整形外科年鉴采用并推荐SAMPL准则进行统计分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The hallmark of scientific validity is confirmation of experimental results. When we read about something new, unless it is some dreaded complication, we want to be able to replicate those results.As plastic surgery has become more scientific, our knowledge of what reproducibility of results means has become more sophisticated. Now we understand that we cannot assume that there is causal relationship between observations and outcomes unless the data surpass a statistical threshold to exclude random events. We must be able to understand what it means when we reject the null hypothesis. We no longer can mimic the 4-year-old who exclaims, "My P value is smaller than yours; so my results are better!"
机译:科学有效性的标志是实验结果的证实。当我们读到一些新的东西时,除非有一些可怕的并发症,否则我们希望能够复制这些结果。随着整形外科变得越来越科学,我们对结果可重复性的理解也越来越复杂。现在我们知道,除非数据超过统计阈值以排除随机事件,否则我们不能假设观察结果与结果之间存在因果关系。当我们拒绝原假设时,我们必须能够理解其含义。我们不再模仿那个四岁的孩子,他大喊:“我的P值小于您的P,因此我的结果更好!”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号