首页> 外文期刊>Australian Farm Journal >Organics can justify some food improvements but generalisations are not valid
【24h】

Organics can justify some food improvements but generalisations are not valid

机译:有机物可以证明某些食物的改良是合理的,但是概括是无效的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While mass foodstuff production was achieved in industrialised countries during the 20th century, the limitations of such an intensive production system have been highlighted for decades by ecologists and some agronomists, nutritionists and medical doctors. With the emergence of sufficient quantities of certified organic food over the last 20 years comparison studies are being undertaken between nutritional and food safety of this source versus mass-produced foods. An independent evaluation of the two sources of foods has recently been published by the French Agency for Food Safety -Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA). Heading the review team is Dr Denis Lairon at the Faculty of Medicine, University Aix-Marseille, Marseille,France. Only credible scientific evaluations of certified organic food were included in the review.
机译:在20世纪工业化国家实现了大规模食品生产的同时,生态学家和一些农艺师,营养学家和医生几十年来一直强调这种集约化生产体系的局限性。在过去的20年中,随着足够数量的认证有机食品的出现,该来源的营养和食品安全与大量生产的食品之间进行了比较研究。法国食品安全局-法国食品安全局(AFSSA)最近发布了对两种食物来源的独立评估。负责审核小组的是法国马赛Aix-Marseille大学医学院的Denis Lairon博士。该评价仅包括经认证的有机食品的可靠科学评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号