...
首页> 外文期刊>Auris, nasus, larynx >A preliminary study on application of portable monitoring for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.
【24h】

A preliminary study on application of portable monitoring for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.

机译:便携式监测在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断中的应用初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Portable monitoring (PM) for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea has developed recently. Many studies were performed in the laboratory setting, with simultaneous polysomnographic recordings or required technical assistance in the home setting. And the data were automatically analyzed. In this study, we attempted to evaluate whether PM could be useful in fully unattended home setting, and whether the auto analysis of the data is reliable. Home setting examination by Stardust II, a novel PM device, was performed unattendedly on consecutive 62 patients who complained of snoring. The questionnaire survey on the difficulty of fitting and operation, and the discomfort was conducted by visual analog scale. Automatically and manually analyzed results were compared. The examination was successfully performed by all subjects. The difficulty of fitting and operation, and the discomfort were 2.9+/-1.9, 1.8+/-1.2 and 3.6+/-2.1, respectively. Auto analysis differed significantly from manual analysis not only in apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), but also in the construction of sleep disordered respiratory events. Although AHI in automatic and manual analysis had a good correlation (r=0.949; P<0.001), their agreement was poor, especially in mild and moderate cases. However, setting AHI=50 as a cut-off point in auto analysis, sensitivity and specificity could reach 100% and 92.5%, respectively. Accordingly, PM is useful to identify obstructive sleep apnea in an unattended home setting condition. Considering the significant difference between automatic and manual analysis, we suggest that the data analysis should be performed manually.
机译:用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断的便携式监测(PM)最近已经发展起来。在实验室环境中进行了许多研究,同时在家庭环境中进行了多导睡眠图记录或需要技术帮助。并自动分析数据。在这项研究中,我们试图评估PM在完全无人值守的家庭环境中是否有用,以及数据的自动分析是否可靠。连续62位抱怨打呼s的患者无意中进行了由Stardust II(一种新型的PM设备)进行的居家检查。通过安装和操作困难程度的问卷调查,以视觉模拟量表进行不适。比较自动和手动分析的结果。所有受试者均成功完成了检查。装配和操作困难以及不适感分别为2.9 +/- 1.9、1.8 +/- 1.2和3.6 +/- 2.1。自动分析与手动分析显着不同,不仅在呼吸暂停/呼吸不足指数(AHI)方面,而且在睡眠障碍性呼吸事件的构建方面也是如此。尽管AHI在自动和手动分析中具有良好的相关性(r = 0.949; P <0.001),但它们的一致性较差,尤其是在轻度和中度病例中。但是,将AHI = 50设置为自动分析的临界点,灵敏度和特异性可能分别达到100%和92.5%。因此,PM可用于在无人看管的家庭环境中识别阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。考虑到自动和手动分析之间的显着差异,我们建议数据分析应手动执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号