...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Value of a structured participant evaluation questionnaire in the development of a surgical education program.
【24h】

Value of a structured participant evaluation questionnaire in the development of a surgical education program.

机译:结构化参与者评估问卷在制定外科教育计划中的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the summative evaluation of attitudes and perceptions of participants at a surgical skills workshop influences and contributes to the development of the workshop. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred participants from 11 workshops were invited to complete a structured scored anonymous questionnaire with 18 statements, at the end of each workshop. Space was provided for free comment next to each statement. The questionnaire covered all aspects of the workshop including the practical modules, learning materials, organisation, facilitators and the relevance of the workshop to their needs. Ninety-eight of the 100 participants returned the questionnaire and this analysis is based on their responses. RESULTS: All respondents considered the workshop content, structure and facilities enabled the educational objectives to be achieved. The scored responses to the structured statements helped to determine the degree of satisfaction with the workshop domains, but did not give direction forchange. The informal 'free' comments gave insight as to how improvements could be achieved in specific domains. Numerous changes suggested by participants have been included in subsequent workshops. CONCLUSION: Summative evaluation of an educational program is important to determine participant satisfaction and to determine areas needing improvement. Structured scored questionnaires are helpful in determining levels of satisfaction with the various domains of the program. Informal written comments allow insight into specific areas requiring improvement and may provide guidance as to how improvement can be achieved. Space for such comment should be encouraged in any program evaluation questionnaire.
机译:目的:描述对外科技能研讨会上参与者的态度和看法的总结评估如何影响和促进研讨会的发展。材料和方法:在每个研讨会结束时,邀请了11个研讨会的100名参与者完成了18项陈述的结构化评分匿名问卷。每个声明旁边都提供了可供自由评论的空间。问卷涵盖了讲习班的所有方面,包括实用模块,学习材料,组织,主持人以及讲习班与其需求的相关性。 100位参与者中有98位返回了问卷,该分析基于他们的回答。结果:所有受访者都认为研讨会的内容,结构和设施使教育目标得以实现。对结构化陈述的评分评分有助于确定对讲习班领域的满意程度,但没有给出改变的方向。非正式的“免费”评论为如何在特定领域实现改进提供了见识。参与者建议的许多更改已包含在后续的研讨会中。结论:对教育计划的总结评估对于确定参与者的满意度和确定需要改进的领域很重要。结构化的计分问卷有助于确定对计划各个领域的满意度。非正式的书面评论可让您深入了解需要改进的特定领域,并可以提供有关如何实现改进的指导。在任何计划评估问卷中都应鼓励发表这样的评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号