首页> 外文期刊>Athletic therapy today : >Baseline Concussion Symptom Scores Vary by Method of Collection
【24h】

Baseline Concussion Symptom Scores Vary by Method of Collection

机译:基线脑震荡症状评分因收集方法而异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: The vast majority of athletic trainers administer preseason computerized inventories to document the presence of baseline symptoms; however, immediately following a concussion, athletic trainers frequently assess an athlete verbally or using a paper-based concussion symptom scale. The verbal or paper-based results are then compared with the preseason computer results. Little research is available regarding whether the methodology in which these symptoms are collected has an impact on the report given by the athlete. Objective: To determine if baseline self-reported concussion symptom scores varied among collection methods. Design: Crossover study design. Setting: University research laboratory. Participants: Fifty-two healthy subjects (36 males, 16 females; age 20.27 + 1.36 years; mass 72.68 + 14.88 kg; height 175.05 + 8.50 cm). Interventions: All subjects completed, as part of routine preseason baseline testing, the postconcussion scale revised symptom inventory scale in three ways: (1) using a computer, (2) verbally, and (3) on paper. Main Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics were calculated. One-way ANOVAs were conducted to determine the difference in overall symptom score between the inventory methods and sexes as well. Alpha level was set a priori at .05. Results: Overall, participants reported a significantly higher number of symptoms on computer-based symptom inventories compared with either verbal-(t_(51) = 3.014, P = .004,95% confidence interval [CI], 0.668 to 3.32) or paper-based inventories (t_(51) = 3.004, P = .004, 95% CI 0.765 to 3.850). No significant differences were found between verbal- and paper-based inventories (t_(51) = 1.129, P = .264, 95% CI -0.240 to 0.855). Conclusions: Computer-based symptom inventories were significantly different than verbal- or paper-based symptom inventories. Participants may report a higher number of symptoms at baseline when reporting electronically compared with verbal- or paper-based reporting methods. The method in which symptom inventory is obtained may alter the postconcussion diagnosis and warrants further investigation.
机译:背景:绝大多数体育教练会管理季前计算机化清单,以记录基线症状的存在;但是,在发生脑震荡后,运动训练员经常会口头评估运动员或使用纸质脑震荡症状量表。然后将口头或基于纸张的结果与季前计算机的结果进行比较。关于收集这些症状的方法是否会对运动员的报告产生影响,目前尚无研究。目的:确定基线自我报告的脑震荡症状评分在收集方法之间是否存在差异。设计:交叉研究设计。地点:大学研究实验室。参与者:52名健康受试者(男36例,女16例;年龄20.27 + 1.36岁;体重72.68 + 14.88千克;身高175.05 + 8.50厘米)。干预:作为常规的季前基线测试的一部分,所有受试者均以三种方式完成了脑震荡后量表修订后的症状量表的量表:(1)使用计算机,(2)口头,和(3)在纸上。主要结果指标:计算描述性统计数据。进行单向方差分析以确定清单方法和性别之间的总体症状评分的差异。先验水平设置为0.05。结果:总体而言,与基于口头(t_(51)= 3.014,P = .004,95%置信区间[CI],0.668至3.32)或论文的参与者相比,基于计算机的症状清单中的参与者报告的症状数量显着更高(t_(51)= 3.004,P = .004,95%CI 0.765至3.850)。口头和纸质存货之间没有发现显着差异(t_(51)= 1.129,P = .264,95%CI -0.240至0.855)。结论:基于计算机的症状清单与基于语言或纸质的症状清单明显不同。与基于口头或书面报告的方法相比,以电子方式进行报告的参与者在基线时可能报告更多的症状。获得症状清单的方法可能会改变脑震荡后的诊断,需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号