...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Relevance of molecular markers in prostate cancer.
【24h】

Relevance of molecular markers in prostate cancer.

机译:分子标记物在前列腺癌中的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

TO THE EDITOR: The editorial by Gelmann and Henshall (1) on our article (2) regarding molecular markers in prostate cancer (2) may generate several misconceptions. Our emphasis was on novel associations between molecular markers obtained at biopsy and long-term mortality. Although many articles "evaluating correlations of P53 and BCL2 expression and microvessel density" (1) have indeed been published elsewhere, a gap in knowledge still existed-whether marker status at diagnosis (vs. after surgery) affects survival (vs. presuming biochemical failure is an equivalent outcome). By conducting a comprehensive review of medical records, retrieving original biopsy tissue, and using rigorous methods of clinical epidemiology, we demonstrated in a large community-based population that these ; markers at diagnosis confer an independent, long-term risk for death from prostate cancer.
机译:致编者:Gelmann和Henshall(1)在我们的文章(2)上有关前列腺癌分子标记(2)的社论可能会产生一些误解。我们的重点是活检获得的分子标记与长期死亡率之间的新型关联。尽管许多文章“评估P53和BCL2表达与微血管密度的相关性”(1)确实在其他地方发表,但知识上仍然存在差距-诊断时的标志物状态(与手术后相比)是否会影响生存率(与生化失败有关)。是等效的结果)。通过对病历进行全面审查,检索原始的活检组织并使用严格的临床流行病学方法,我们在一个以社区为基础的大型人群中证明了这些;诊断时的标志物赋予前列腺癌死亡的独立,长期风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号