...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria as predictors of outcomes in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a cohort study.
【24h】

Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria as predictors of outcomes in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a cohort study.

机译:估计的肾小球滤过率和蛋白尿可作为高心血管风险患者预后的指标:一项队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria are risk factors for cardiovascular disease and markers of renal function. OBJECTIVE: To examine the contribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio beyond that of traditional cardiovascular risk factors to classification of patient risk for cardiovascular and renal outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study that pooled all patients of ONTARGET (ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) and TRANSCEND (Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme-Inhibitor Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease). PATIENTS: 27,620 patients older than 55 years with documented cardiovascular disease, who were followed for a mean of 4.6 years. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline eGFR, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, and cardiovascular risk factors. Outcomes were all-cause mortality; a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure; long-term dialysis; and a composite of long-term dialysis and doubling of serum creatinine level. RESULTS: Lower eGFRs and higher urinary albumin-creatinine ratios were associated with the primary cardiovascular composite outcome (for example, an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.53 [95% CI, 1.61 to 3.99] for an eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) and a very high urinary albumin-creatinine ratio). However, adding information about eGFR and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio to the risk reclassification analyses led to no meaningful decrease in the proportion of patients assigned to the intermediate-risk category (31% without vs. 32% with renal information). In contrast, eGFR and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio were strongly associated with risk for long-term dialysis and greatly improved both model calibration and risk stratification capacity when added to traditional cardiovascular risk factors (65% assigned to intermediate-risk categories without renal information vs. 18% with renal information). LIMITATION: Creatinine levels were not standardized. CONCLUSION: In patients with high vascular risk, eGFR and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio add little to traditional cardiovascular risk factors for stratifying cardiovascular risk but greatly improve risk stratification for renal outcomes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Boehringer Ingelheim, Population Health Research Institute, and the European Commission.
机译:背景:肾小球滤过率和蛋白尿是心血管疾病和肾功能标志物的危险因素。目的:研究估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和尿白蛋白-肌酐比值超出传统心血管危险因素的贡献对患者心血管和肾脏结局风险的分类。设计:前瞻性队列研究汇总了所有ONTARGET(单独进行替米沙坦治疗并与雷米普利全球终点试验联合使用)和TRANSCEND(替米沙坦对血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂耐受性心血管疾病患者进行的随机评估研究)患者。患者:年龄在55岁以上的有27,620例有心血管疾病的患者,平均随访4.6年。测量:基线eGFR,尿白蛋白-肌酐比值和心血管危险因素。结果是全因死亡率;心血管死亡,心肌梗塞,中风和心力衰竭住院的综合体;长期透析;以及长期透析和血清肌酐水平加倍的综合体。结果:较低的eGFR和较高的尿白蛋白-肌酐比值与主要的心血管复合结果相关(例如,当eGFR <30 mL / min / 1.73 m(2.50 [95%CI,1.61至3.99]时,调整后的危险比为2.53 [95%CI,1.61至3.99] 2)和非常高的尿白蛋白-肌酐比例)。但是,将有关eGFR和尿白蛋白-肌酐比值的信息添加到风险重新分类分析中,不会导致分配给中度风险类别的患者比例发生有意义的下降(无肾信息的患者为31%,有肾信息的患者为32%)。相比之下,当将eGFR和尿白蛋白-肌酐比值与长期透析的风险密切相关时,当将其添加到传统的心血管风险因素中时,模型校正和风险分层能力都得到了极大的改善(65%归为没有肾脏信息的中危人群18%有肾脏信息)。局限性:肌酐水平未标准化。结论:在具有高血管风险的患者中,eGFR和尿白蛋白-肌酐比值对传统的心血管危险因素几乎没有增加用于分层心血管危险的因素,但可以大大改善肾脏结局的危险分层。主要资金来源:勃林格殷格翰,人口健康研究所和欧盟委员会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号