首页> 外文期刊>Health policy >Does providing everyone with free-of-charge organised exercise opportunities work in public health?
【24h】

Does providing everyone with free-of-charge organised exercise opportunities work in public health?

机译:为每个人提供免费的有组织的锻炼机会对公共卫生有用吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and purpose: Population-level initiatives of free-of-charge organised exercise have been im-plemented to encourage residents to take up regular physical activity. However, there exists a paucity of evidence on the ability of these interventions to attract and engage residents, especially targeted sub-groups. Seeking to contribute to this evidence base, we evaluated a proportionate universal programme providing free exercise sessions, Leeds Let's Get Active. Methods: Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the programme data and participants. Time to event, count and logistic regression models examined how different population subgroups engaged with the programme in terms of number of entries, weekly participation rates and drop-off patterns. Results: 51,874 adult residents registered to the programme and provided baseline data (2013-2016). A small proportion (1.6) attended the free sessions on a weekly basis. Higher participation rates were estimated for the groups of males, retired and non-inactive participants. A neighbourhood-level depriva-tion status was found to have no marginal effect on the level and frequency of participation, but to be negatively associated with participation drop-off (HR 0.93, 95 CI 0.89-0.97, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Providing everyone with free-of-charge organised exercise opportunities in public leisure centres located in deprived areas can attract large volumes of residents, but may not sufficiently encour-age adults, especially inactive residents and those living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, to take up regular exercise. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:背景和目的:在人口层面实施免费有组织的运动,以鼓励居民定期进行体育活动。然而,关于这些干预措施吸引和吸引居民,特别是目标亚群体的能力的证据很少。为了为这一证据基础做出贡献,我们评估了一个提供免费锻炼课程的比例普遍计划,利兹让我们活跃起来。方法:采用描述性统计对项目数据和参与者进行总结。事件发生时间、计数和逻辑回归模型研究了不同人口亚组在参与人数、每周参与率和辍学模式方面如何参与该计划。结果:51,874 名成年居民注册了该计划并提供基线数据(2013-2016 年)。一小部分(1.6%)每周参加免费课程。据估计,男性、退休人员和非活跃参与者的参与率较高。发现邻里层面的剥夺状态对参与的水平和频率没有边际影响,但与参与下降呈负相关(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.89-0.97,p = 0.001)。结论:在位于贫困地区的公共康乐中心为每个人提供免费的有组织的运动机会,可以吸引大量居民,但可能不足以鼓励适龄成年人,特别是不活跃的居民和居住在弱势社区的居民,定期锻炼。(c) 2022 年爱思唯尔 B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号