...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences >Comparison of growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Korean local chickens and silky fowl.
【24h】

Comparison of growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Korean local chickens and silky fowl.

机译:比较韩国当地鸡和乌骨鸡的生长性能,car体特性和肉质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was conducted to compare growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of 4 breeds of local chicken. A total of 480 1-d-old chicks were distributed to 16 pens, with 4 treatments of breed, 4 replicates and 30 chicks per pen. Three Korean local breeds of white-mini broiler, Hanhyup-3-ho, and Woorimatdag, and a breed of silky fowl were raised under identical rearing and feeding conditions for 31-d, 37-d, 36-d, and 59-d, respectively. The BW and feed consumption on a pen basis were weekly measured for all pens, and ADFI, ADG and gain:feed were calculated for each pen. The ADFI and ADG of 3 breeds of Korean local chicken were greater than those of silky fowl (p<0.05). Within the Korean local breeds, ADFI of white-mini broiler was the highest (p<0.05), and ADG of Hanhyup-3-ho and white-mini broiler was the highest (p<0.05). Gain:feed of silky fowl was less than that of the 3 breeds of Korean local chicken. The carcass and breast yield of white-mini broiler were the greater than those of other breeds (p<0.05). The breast meat color (CIE L*, a*, and b*) of 3 breeds of Korean local chicken were higher than that of silky fowl (p<0.05). The breast meat of Hanhyup-3-ho had greater cooking loss (p<0.05), whereas water holding capacity and pH were less than those of other breeds (p<0.05). The color score of 3 breeds of Korean local chicken was higher than that of silky fowl (p<0.05). Woorimatdag had a higher score on tenderness (p<0.05), whereas flavor score was less than that of other breeds (p<0.05). In conclusion, 4 local breeds of chicken have some unique features and seem to have more advantages, and this information can help consumers who prefer healthy and premium chicken meat.
机译:本研究旨在比较4种当地鸡的生长性能,car体特性和肉质。总共将480只1日龄雏鸡分配到16只圈舍,进行4种繁殖,4个重复和每只圈舍30只雏鸡。在相同的饲养和饲养条件下,分别在31天,37天,36天和59天的相同饲养和饲养条件下饲养了三种韩国本地迷你白肉鸡,Hanhyup-3-ho和Woorimatdag以及一种丝质家禽。 , 分别。每周测量所有笔的体重和饲料消耗量,并为每只笔计算ADFI,ADG和增益:饲料。 3种韩国当地鸡的ADFI和ADG均大于丝质禽(p <0.05)。在韩国本地品种中,白色迷你肉鸡的ADFI最高(p <0.05),Hanhyup-3-ho和白色迷你肉鸡的ADG最高(p <0.05)。收益:乌骨鸡的进食量少于韩国当地3种鸡的进食量。白色迷你肉鸡的car体和胸肉产量高于其他品种(p <0.05)。 3个韩国地方鸡品种的胸肉颜色(CIE L *,a *和b *)高于丝鸡(p <0.05)。 Hanhyup-3-ho的胸肉烹饪损失更大(p <0.05),而持水量和pH值低于其他品种(p <0.05)。 3种韩国地方鸡的颜色评分均高于丝质禽(p <0.05)。 Woorimatdag的嫩度评分较高(p <0.05),而风味评分低于其他品种(p <0.05)。综上所述,当地的4种鸡肉具有独特的功能,并且似乎具有更多的优势,这些信息可以帮助喜欢健康和优质鸡肉的消费者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号