首页> 外文期刊>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences >The Effect of Inclusion Level of Soybean Oil and Palm Oil on Their Digestible and Metabolizable Energy Content Determined with the Difference and Regression Method When Fed to Growing Pigs
【24h】

The Effect of Inclusion Level of Soybean Oil and Palm Oil on Their Digestible and Metabolizable Energy Content Determined with the Difference and Regression Method When Fed to Growing Pigs

机译:饲喂生猪时,大豆油和棕榈油的包合水平对差异和回归法测定其可消化和代谢能含量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of inclusion level of soybean oil (SO) and palm oil (PO) on their digestible and metabolism energy (DE and ME) contents when fed to growing pigs by difference and regression method. Sixty-six crossbred growing barrows (DurocxLandracexYorkshire and weighing 38.1 +/- 2.4 kg) were randomly allotted to a 2x5 factorial arrangement involving 2 lipid sources (SO and PO), and 5 levels of lipid (2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%) as well as a basal diet composed of corn and soybean meal. The barrows were housed in individual metabolism crates to facilitate separate collection of feces and urine, and were fed the assigned test diets at 4% of initial body weight per day. A 5-d total collection of feces and urine followed a 7-d diet adaptation period. The results showed that the DE and ME contents of SO and PO determined by the difference method were not affected by inclusion level. The DE and ME determined by the regression method for SO were greater compared with the corresponding respective values for PO (DE: 37.07, ME: 36.79 MJ/kg for SO; DE: 34.11, ME: 33.84 MJ/kg for PO, respectively). These values were close to the DE and ME values determined by the difference method at the 10% inclusion level (DE: 37.31, ME: 36.83 MJ/kg for SO; DE: 34.62, ME: 33.47 MJ/kg for PO, respectively). A similar response for the apparent total tract digestibility of acid-hydrolyzed ether extract (AEE) in lipids was observed. The true total tract digestibility of AEE in SO was significantly (p0.05) greater than that for PO (97.5% and 91.1%, respectively). In conclusion, the DE and ME contents of lipid was not affected by its inclusion level. The difference method can substitute the regression method to determine the DE and ME contents in lipids when the inclusion level is 10%.
机译:通过差异和回归方法,本实验旨在确定饲喂生长猪时豆油(SO)和棕榈油(PO)的夹杂水平对它们的消化能和代谢能(DE和ME)含量的影响。将66头杂交杂交公猪(DurocxLandracexYorkshire,体重38.1 +/- 2.4千克)随机分配到2x5因子分解结构,涉及2种脂质来源(SO和PO)和5种脂质水平(2%,4%,6%, 8%和10%),以及由玉米和大豆粉组成的基础饮食。将手推车放在单独的新陈代谢箱中,以方便粪便和尿液的单独收集,并按每天初始体重的4%喂给指定的测试饮食。在7天的饮食适应期之后,总共收集了5天的粪便和尿液。结果表明,采用差值法测定的SO和PO的DE和ME含量不受夹杂物含量的影响。通过SO的回归方法确定的DE和ME分别大于相应的PO值(SO的DE:37.07,ME:36.79 MJ / kg; PO的DE:34.11,ME:33.84 MJ / kg) 。这些值接近于差异法在10%夹杂物含量下确定的DE和ME值(对于SO,DE:37.31,ME:36.83 MJ / kg;对于PO,DE:34.62,ME:33.47 MJ / kg) 。观察到脂质中酸水解醚提取物(AEE)的表观总道消化率具有相似的响应。 SO中AEE的真实总消化率显着(p <0.05)高于PO(分别为97.5%和91.1%)。总之,脂质的DE和ME含量不受其包合水平的影响。当夹杂物含量为10%时,差异法可以替代回归法来测定脂质中的DE和ME含量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号