...
【24h】

Radiographic Comparison of Anterior Acetabular Rim Morphology Between Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement and Control

机译:钳式髋臼髋臼撞击与对照之间髋臼前缘形态的放射学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To define and compare 3 new parameters (anterior rim angle [ARA], anterior wall angle [AWA], and anterior margin ratio [AMR]), in addition to the lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg and the Tonnis angle, for measuring pincertype femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in an asymptomatic versus symptomatic FAI population. Methods: We reviewed anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of patients verified to have no hip complaints between December 2009 and December 2011. We also reviewed anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of patients who underwent a rim-trimming procedure for pincer FAI between December 2010 and December 2011. Patients aged older than 65 years or younger than 18 years were excluded. Radiographs with a Tonnis grade of 2 or greater were also excluded. For the group of patients with symptomatic hip impingement, radiographs that did not have a crossover sign were excluded. The 2 cohorts were matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Measurements included the Tonnis angle, lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg, ARA, AWA, and AMR. These measurements were compared between the groups. Results: Seventy-two asymptomatic hips were measured. There were 44 female patients (61%) and 28 male patients (39%), aged 25 to 51 years, in the asymptomatic group. The mean ARA was 88.91 degrees +/- 8.06 degrees, the mean AWA was 34.89 degrees +/- 8.09 degrees, and the mean AMR was 0.49 degrees 0.15. Seventy-two symptomatic hips were measured. There were 40 female patients (56%) and 32 male patients (44%), aged 27 to 58 years, in the symptomatic group. The mean ARA was 82.98 degrees +/- 10.82 degrees, the mean AWA was 39.11 degrees +/- 9.00 degrees, and the mean AMR was 0.56 +/- 0.14. The mean difference in the ARA between asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients was 5.92 degrees (P = .0001). The mean difference in the AWA was 4.22 degrees (P = .0019). The mean difference in the AMR was 0.07 (P = .0039). Conclusions: Our study provides information on several measurements within an asymptomatic cohort and a symptomatic cohort. Although we found statistically significant differences between the 2 populations, the clinical significance remains unknown. We recommend using this asymptomatic population as a guideline for limits on resection of the anterior acetabular rim.
机译:目的:除了定义Wiberg的横向中心边缘角和Tonnis角之外,还定义和比较3个新参数(前缘角[ARA],前壁角[AWA]和前缘比[AMR]),在无症状和有症状的FAI人群中测量钳型股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)。方法:我们回顾了2009年12月至2011年12月之间经验证无髋关节不适的患者的骨盆前位片。我们还回顾了在2010年12月至2011年12月之间进行钳形FAI切缘术的患者的骨盆前位片。 65岁以下或18岁以下的青少年被排除在外。 Tonnis等级为2或更高的射线照片也被排除在外。对于有症状性髋关节撞击的患者,不包括没有交叉征象的X光片。这两个队列的年龄,性别和体重指数匹配。测量包括Tonnis角,Wiberg的横向中心边缘角,ARA,AWA和AMR。在组之间比较这些测量。结果:测量了72例无症状的臀部。无症状组中有44名女性患者(61%)和28名男性患者(39%),年龄在25至51岁之间。平均ARA为88.91度+/- 8.06度,平均AWA为34.89度+/- 8.09度,平均AMR为0.49度0.15。测量了72个有症状的臀部。对症组有40例女性患者(56%)和32例男性患者(44%),年龄在27至58岁之间。平均ARA为82.98度+/- 10.82度,平均AWA为39.11度+/- 9.00度,平均AMR为0.56 +/- 0.14。无症状患者和有症状患者的ARA平均差异为5.92度(P = .0001)。 AWA的平均差为4.22度(P = .0019)。 AMR的平均差异为0.07(P = .0039)。结论:我们的研究提供了无症状队列和有症状队列中的几种测量信息。尽管我们发现这两个人群之间存在统计学上的显着差异,但临床意义仍然未知。我们建议使用无症状人群作为限制髋臼前缘切除的指南。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号