...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Outside-in continuous suturing is superior to interrupted suturing for repairing peripheral meniscus lesions: An in vitro biomechanical study using a porcine model
【24h】

Outside-in continuous suturing is superior to interrupted suturing for repairing peripheral meniscus lesions: An in vitro biomechanical study using a porcine model

机译:外而内连续缝合优于间断缝合修复周围半月板病变:使用猪模型的体外生物力学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose This in vitro biomechanical study using a porcine model compared peripheral longitudinal vertical meniscus lesion (PLVML) outside-in suture repair fixation strength using either interrupted or continuous "N" configuration No. 2-0 braided polyester sutures. Methods Porcine lateral menisci were randomly assigned to group 1 (continuous) or group 2 (interrupted). Standardized PLVMLs were created in each specimen. Repaired specimens were placed in a specially designed clamp and loaded into a servohydraulic device. Specimens underwent preconditioning for 10 cycles (0.1 Hz, 5 to 20 N) and 500 submaximal loading cycles (0.5 Hz, 5 to 20 N), before load-to-failure testing (12.5 mm/s). A 30-second pause after preconditioning and after 10, 100, and 500 submaximal loading cycles enabled standardized digital photographs to be taken for gapping measurement determination. The failure mode was documented. Results Displacement and gapping during preconditioning and submaximal loading cycles did not differ between groups. Group 1 withstood a greater failure load (mean, 118.3 N; 95% confidence interval [CI], 97.2 to 139.4 N) than group 2 (mean, 63.7 N; 95% CI, 51.2 to 76.2 N) (P <.0001) and displacement during load-to-failure testing (mean, 5.3 mm; 95% CI, 4.2 to 6.5 mm) than group 2 (mean, 3.2 mm; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.3 mm) (P =.005). Group 1 failed by suture breakage or suture pulling through tissue, whereas group 2 primarily failed by knot slippage (P <.0001). Conclusions Group displacement and gapping differences were not observed after 500 submaximal loading cycles. PLVMLs repaired with a continuous N configuration, however, withstood greater load at failure and greater displacement before failure than repairs that used interrupted sutures. Clinical Relevance Continuous suture in an N configuration may improve PLVML repair fixation strength.
机译:目的使用猪模型进行的这项体外生物力学研究比较了使用间断或连续“ N”型2-0编织聚酯缝合线对外周纵向垂直半月板损伤(PLVML)的缝合线外固定修复强度。方法将猪侧半月板随机分为第1组(连续)或第2组(间断)。在每个样本中创建标准化的PLVML。修复后的标本被放置在专门设计的夹具中,并装入伺服液压装置中。在进行负载至失效测试(12.5 mm / s)之前,对样品进行10个周期(0.1 Hz,5至20 N)的预处理和500个次最大加载周期(0.5 Hz,5至20 N)。预处理后以及10、100和500次最大加载周期后的30秒暂停使得可以拍摄标准数码照片以进行间隙测量确定。记录了故障模式。结果两组之间的预处理和次最大加载周期中的位移和间隙没有差异。与第2组(平均63.7 N; 95%CI 51.2到76.2 N)相比,第1组承受了更大的失效负荷(平均118.3 N; 95%置信区间[CI]为97.2至139.4 N)(P <.0001)负载至破坏测试期间的位移和位移(平均值为5.3 mm; 95%CI为4.2至6.5 mm)比第2组(平均值为3.2 mm; 95%CI为2.1至4.3 mm)(P = .005)。第一组因缝合线断裂或缝线穿过组织失败,而第二组主要因结节滑移而失败(P <.0001)。结论500次次最大加载循环后未观察到组位移和间隙差异。但是,使用连续N形修复的PLVML与使用间断缝合的修复相比,在失败时承受的载荷更大,在失败前承受的位移更大。临床相关性以N形连续缝合可提高PLVML修复固定强度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号