首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Button Fixation Versus Transfemoral Suspensory Fixation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Button Fixation Versus Transfemoral Suspensory Fixation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:使用皮质钮扣固定术与经股动脉悬吊固定术重建前交叉韧带后的临床和功能结局:随机对照试验的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using cortical button versus transfemoral suspensory fixation. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook guidelines and PROSPERO registration. Only Level I and II randomized controlled trials comparing cortical button and transfemoral suspensory fixation in hamstring ACL reconstruction were included. A literature search was performed using electronic databases. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool. All outcomes reported by each study were evaluated. Primary outcome measures were postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Dichotomous data were reported as risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-2. Results: Five studies involving 317 patients were included. The mean follow-up period was 21.7 +/- 7.0 months (range, 12 to 38 months). The mean age of participants was 26.7 +/- 1.89 years (range, 16 to 48 years). The Lysholmscore, Tegner activity score, and IKDC score were compiled. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side differences on KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) testing, and measurements of thigh atrophy, as well as imaging (radiography and computed tomography) to assess for femoral tunnel widening. Pooled statistical analysis was possible only for postoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores. No significant differences were found between the cortical button and transfemoral fixation groups. Included studies did not report differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Radiographic results suggest increased femoral tunnel widening in the cortical button group. However, tunnel widening was not found to affect clinical results. Conclusions: The present evidence suggests that there are no short-to medium-term differences in knee-specific outcome measures between patients treated with cortical button femoral graft fixation and those treated with suspensory transfemoral fixation when undergoing ACL reconstruction. In addition, radiologic evidence of tunnel widening does not seem to affect short-to medium-term clinical outcomes.
机译:目的:比较使用皮质钮扣与经股骨悬吊固定术重建前十字韧带(ACL)后的临床和功能结果。方法:这项系统评价是根据Cochrane手册指南和PROSPERO注册进行的。只有I级和II级随机对照试验比较了股骨头ACL重建中的皮质钮扣和股骨悬吊固定。使用电子数据库进行文献检索。使用Cochrane Collaboration的偏见风险工具评估了纳入研究的方法学质量。评估每项研究报告的所有结局。主要结局指标为术后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和Lysholm膝关节评分。使用RevMan软件(北欧Cochrane中心,Cochrane协作公司,哥本哈根)进行统计分析。报告的二分数据为风险比和95%置信区间。使用I-2评估异质性。结果:五项研究涉及317例患者。平均随访时间为21.7 +/- 7.0个月(范围12至38个月)。参与者的平均年龄为26.7 +/- 1.89岁(范围为16至48岁)。编制了Lysholmscore,Tegner活动评分和IKDC评分。临床评估通过Lachman测试,KT-1000的左右差异评估(MEDmetric,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚)进行测试,大腿萎缩的测量以及影像学(放射线照相和计算机断层扫描)以评估股骨隧道加宽。仅对术后IKDC和Lysholm评分进行汇总统计分析是可能的。在皮质钮扣和经股骨固定组之间没有发现显着差异。纳入的研究没有报告两组之间临床结果的差异。影像学结果提示皮质纽扣组股骨隧道变宽。但是,未发现隧道拓宽影响临床结果。结论:目前的证据表明,在进行ACL重建时,采用皮质钮扣股骨固定术的患者与经悬吊股骨固定术的患者在膝关节特异性结局指标方面没有短期至中期的差异。另外,隧道拓宽的放射学证据似乎并不影响短期至中期的临床结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号