【24h】

Is the Clock Face an Accurate, Precise, and Reliable Measuring Tool for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

机译:钟面是否是前十字韧带重建的准确,准确和可靠的测量工具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: (1) To assess the use and practice of the clock face among surgeons who routinely perform anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, and (2) to assess the accuracy, precision, and reliability of 3 commonly used clock-face schemes in ACL reconstruction. Methods: First, 9 surgeons completed a questionnaire assessing the use and definition of the clock-face technique. Next, to assess the accuracy, precision, and reliability of the clock face, each surgeon estimated the "time" of 8 artificial femur models with a black dot located on the posterior aspect of the lateral condylar wall. The estimates were performed using 3 different clock-face schemes and were repeated 10 months later. Solutions for each specimen were obtained by use of a computer graphical interface. Results: More than half of the respondents (55%) use the clock face in ACL reconstructions, with the reported mean ideal "time" for a femoral tunnel in a right knee of 10:05 (SD, 31 minutes). When we accounted for the different clock definitions, this ideal position was found along the entire lateral condylar wall. In the assessment of the performance of the clock face, the mean error was 32 to 40 minutes (which translates to 3 to 4 mm) among the 3 clock schemes. The maximum error was 4 hours 0 minutes, and the range of responses was 1 hour 0 minutes to 4 hours 0 minutes depending on the specimen and clock scheme. Regardless of the clock scheme used, the intrarater and inter-rater reliabilities were similar—measuring, on average, 0.78 and 0.68, respectively. Conclusions: The clock face continues to be commonly used in ACL reconstruction. Different clock-face definitions affect the position for the same "time." When the clock-face parameters were strictly denned, there was good reliability with borderline accuracy and poor precision. Clinical Relevance: Considering the borderline performance of the clock face in accuracy and poor precision, we recommend against using the clock face in ACL reconstruction.
机译:目的:(1)在例行常规前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的外科医生中评估钟面的使用和实践,以及(2)评估3种常用钟面方案的准确性,准确性和可靠性。 ACL重建。方法:首先,有9位外科医生完成了一份调查表,评估了表盘技术的使用和定义。接下来,为了评估钟面的准确性,准确性和可靠性,每个外科医生估计了8个人工股骨模型的“时间”,这些模型的fe点位于外侧the突壁的后方,并带有黑点。估算是使用3种不同的时钟面方案进行的,并在10个月后重复进行。通过使用计算机图形界面获得每个样品的溶液。结果:超过一半的受访者(55%)在ACL重建中使用了钟面,据报道右膝的股骨隧道平均理想“时间”为10:05(标准差,31分钟)。当我们考虑不同的时钟定义时,在整个外侧con突壁上都找到了这个理想位置。在评估时钟面的性能时,三种时钟方案中的平均误差为32至40分钟(转换为3至4毫米)。最大误差为4小时0分钟,根据样品和时钟方案,响应范围为1小时0分钟至4小时0分钟。无论使用哪种时钟方案,评估者内部和评估者之间的可靠性都是相似的,平均分别为0.78和0.68。结论:钟面仍然是ACL重建中常用的方法。不同的钟面定义会影响同一“时间”的位置。严格规定表盘参数时,可靠性高,边界精度高,精度差。临床意义:考虑到钟面在准确性​​和准确性方面的临界性能,我们建议不要在ACL重建中使用钟面。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号