首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.
【24h】

Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.

机译:双股fix绳肌腱移植重建ACL的不同股骨固定装置之间的比较:生物力学分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the mechanical behavior of some devices used for femoral fixation of doubled hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction when included in a graft fixation complex (GFC). METHODS: An ACL reconstruction was performed on 90 porcine knees. The graft used was the doubled lateral extensor of toes (DLET). Nine different femoral fixation devices were tested and classified according to their fixation mechanism: compression (Bioscrew and RCI screw); expansion (Rigidfix); cortical suspension (Ligament Anchor, EndoButton-CL, and Swing Bridge); cancellous suspension (Linx-HT); and cortical-cancellous suspension (Transfix and Bio-Transfix). All GFC were subjected to a cyclic loading test, then to a load-to-failure test. Graft elongation after 1,000 load cycles, failure load, and stiffness were calculated for each device. RESULTS: Regarding graft elongation, Bioscrew and RCI screws showed the highest mean values. All the other GFC showed no significant differences between them when delta elongation (elongation(1,000 cycles) - elongation(20 cycles)) was considered. For failure load, the highest mean values were observed for Bio-Transfix, Transfix, and Swing Bridge; a homogeneous subset with the lowest mean values was formed by Ligament Anchor, RCI screw, Bioscrew, and Linx-HT. For stiffness, the greatest values were observed for Bio-Transfix, Transfix, and Swing Bridge; all other groups showed no significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical-cancellous suspension fixation seemed to offer the best and most predictable results in terms of elongation, fixation strength, and stiffness. For both compression and suspension, the weakest fixation was attained with cancellous fixation devices. Cortical suspension devices showed a greatly variable mechanical behavior, according to their design. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Transcondylar devices offer the best structural properties for femoral fixation of doubled hamstring tendon graft in ACLreconstruction.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较一些用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中的双股ham绳肌腱移植物股骨固定的器械的机械性能,包括在移植物固定复合物(GFC)中。方法:对90只猪的膝盖进行ACL重建。使用的移植物是脚趾的双侧伸肌(DLET)。对九种不同的股骨固定装置进行了测试,并根据其固定机制进行了分类:压缩(Bioscrew和RCI螺钉);扩展(Rigidfix);皮质悬吊系统(韧带锚,EndoButton-CL和吊桥);松质悬浮液(Linx-HT);以及皮质-松质悬浮液(Transfix和Bio-Transfix)。所有GFC都要进行循环负载测试,然后再进行负载到故障测试。计算每个设备在1,000次负载循环后的接枝伸长率,破坏负载和刚度。结果:关于移植物伸长率,Bioscrew和RCI螺钉显示出最高平均值。当考虑Δ伸长率(伸长率(1,000个循环)-伸长率(20个循环))时,所有其他GFC在它们之间没有显示出显着差异。对于失效载荷,Bio-Transfix,Transfix和Swing Bridge的平均值最高。韧带锚,RCI螺钉,Bioscrew和Linx-HT形成了均值最低的均质子集。对于刚度,Bio-Transfix,Transfix和Swing Bridge观察到最大值。其他所有组之间均无显着差异。结论:就伸长率,固定强度和刚度而言,皮质-松质悬浮液固定似乎提供了最佳和最可预测的结果。对于压缩和悬吊,用松质固定装置获得最弱的固定。根据其设计,皮质悬挂装置的机械性能变化很大。临床相关性:con突装置为ACL重建中双股绳肌腱移植物的股骨固定提供了最佳的结构特性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号