首页> 外文期刊>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine >Pulmonary large cell carcinoma lacking squamous differentiation is clinicopathologically indistinguishable from solid-subtype adenocarcinoma
【24h】

Pulmonary large cell carcinoma lacking squamous differentiation is clinicopathologically indistinguishable from solid-subtype adenocarcinoma

机译:缺乏鳞状分化的肺大细胞癌在临床病理上与实体亚型腺癌没有区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context:-Pulmonary large cell carcinoma (LCC) includes tumors not readily diagnosed as adenocarcinoma (ADC) or squamous cell carcinoma on morphologic grounds, without regard to immunophenotype, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). This ambiguous designation may cause confusion over selection of mutation testing and directed therapies. Several groups have proposed the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) to recategorize LCC as ADC or squamous cell carcinoma; however, it remains unclear if strictly defined LCCs are a clinicopathologically distinct lung tumor subset. Objective:-To compare the pathologic, molecular, and clinical features of 2 morphologically similar tumors: solidsubtype ADC and LCC. Design.-Tumors were included on the basis of solid growth pattern; tumors with squamous or neuroendocrine differentiation were excluded. Solid ADC (n=42) and LCC (n = 57) were diagnosed by using WHO criteria (5 intracellular mucin droplets in ≥2 high-power fields for solid ADC) and tested for KRAS, EGFR, and ALK alterations. Results:-Both solid ADC and LCC groups were dominated by tumors with "undifferentiated"-type morphology and both had a high frequency of thyroid transcription factor 1 expression. KRAS was mutated in 38% of solid ADCs versus 43% of LCCs (P = .62). One ALK-rearranged and 1 EGFR-mutated tumor were detected in the solid ADC and LCC groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical features or outcomes; the prevalence of smoking in both groups was greater than 95%. Conclusions:-Other than a paucity of intracellular mucin, LCC lacking squamous or neuroendocrine differentiation is indistinguishable from solid-subtype ADC. We propose the reclassification of these tumors as mucin-poor solid adenocarcinomas.
机译:背景:根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的研究,肺大细胞癌(LCC)包括根据形态学原因不容易诊断为腺癌(ADC)或鳞状细胞癌的肿瘤。这种模棱两可的名称可能会导致对突变测试和定向疗法的选择感到困惑。几个小组提出了使用免疫组织化学(IHC)将LCC重新分类为ADC或鳞状细胞癌的方法。但是,尚不清楚严格定义的LCC是否为临床病理上不同的肺肿瘤亚群。目的:-比较两种亚型相似的肿瘤:实体亚型ADC和LCC的病理,分子和临床特征。设计-肿瘤是根据坚实的增长模式包括在内的;鳞状或神经内分泌分化的肿瘤被排除在外。固态ADC(n = 42)和LCC(n = 57)是根据WHO标准诊断的(固态ADC≥2个高倍视野中有5个细胞内粘蛋白液滴),并测试了KRAS,EGFR和ALK的变化。结果:-实体ADC组和LCC组均以“未分化”型形态的肿瘤为主,两者的甲状腺转录因子1表达频率较高。在38%的固态ADC中,KRAS发生了突变,而在LCC中则为43%(P = .62)。在实体ADC和LCC组中分别检测到1个ALK重排和1个EGFR突变的肿瘤。临床特征或结局无明显差异;两组的吸烟率均大于95%。结论:-除了缺乏细胞内黏蛋白外,缺乏鳞状细胞或神经内分泌分化的LCC与固体亚型ADC没有区别。我们提议将这些肿瘤重分类为贫粘蛋白的实体腺癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号