首页> 外文期刊>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine >Immunohistochemistry practices of cytopathology laboratories: A survey of participants in the college of American pathologists nongynecologic cytopathology education program
【24h】

Immunohistochemistry practices of cytopathology laboratories: A survey of participants in the college of American pathologists nongynecologic cytopathology education program

机译:细胞病理学实验室的免疫组织化学实践:对美国病理学家非妇科细胞病理学教育计划参与者的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Context: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is important for cytology but poses special challenges because preanalytic conditions may differ from the conditions of IHC-positive controls.Objectives: To broadly survey cytology laboratories to quantify preanalytic platforms for cytology IHC and identify problems with particular platforms or antigens. To discover how validation guidelines for HER2 testing have affected cytology.Design: A voluntary survey of cytology IHC practices was sent to 1899 cytology laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program in the fall of 2009.Results: A total of 818 laboratories (43%) responded to the survey by April 2010. Three hundred fourty-five of 791 respondents (44%) performed IHC on cytology specimens. Seventeen different fixation and processing platforms prior to antibody reaction were reported. A total of 59.2% of laboratories reported differences between the platforms for cytology specimens and positive controls, but most (155 of 184; 84%) did not alter antibody dilutions or antigen retrieval for cytology IHC. When asked to name 2 antibodies for which staining conditions differed between cytology and surgical samples, there were 18 responses listing 14 antibodies. A total of 30.6% of laboratories performing IHC offered HER2 testing before publication of the 2007 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncologists guidelines, compared with 33.6% afterward, with increased performance of testing by reference laboratories. Three laboratories validated a nonformalin HER2 platform.Conclusions: The platforms for cytology IHC and positive controls differ for most laboratories, yet conditions are uncommonly adjusted for cytology specimens. Except for the unsuitability of air-dried smears for HER2 testing, the survey did not reveal evidence of systematic problems with any antibody or platform.
机译:背景:免疫组织化学(IHC)对于细胞学很重要,但由于预分析条件可能与IHC阳性对照的条件不同而面临特殊挑战。目的:广泛调查细胞学实验室以量化细胞学IHC的分析前平台并确定特定平台或抗原的问题。目的:了解HER2检测的验证指南如何影响细胞学。设计:2009年秋天,对参与美国病理学家学院Nongynecologic细胞病理学教育计划的1899个细胞学实验室进行了细胞学IHC实践的自愿调查。结果:总共818实验室(43%)在2010年4月之前对此调查做出了回应。791名受访者中有345位(44%)对细胞学标本进行了IHC。报告了抗体反应之前的十七种不同的固定和处理平台。共有59.2%的实验室报告了细胞学样本平台与阳性对照之间的差异,但大多数(184个样本中的155个; 84%)没有改变细胞学IHC的抗体稀释度或抗原回收率。当要求命名2种在细胞学和手术样品之间染色条件不同的抗体时,有18种反应列出了14种抗体。在2007年美国病理学家学院/美国临床肿瘤医师学会指南发布之前,总共有30.6%的进行IHC的实验室提供了HER2检测,而之后的比例为33.6%,而参考实验室的检测性能有所提高。三个实验室验证了非福尔马林HER2平台的结论。结论:大多数实验室的细胞学IHC和阳性对照的平台不同,但细胞学标本的条件很少调整。除了不适合使用风干涂片进行HER2测试外,该调查没有发现任何抗体或平台存在系统性问题的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号