首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Clinical significance of left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: An appraisal and comparison with left hepatectomy
【24h】

Clinical significance of left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: An appraisal and comparison with left hepatectomy

机译:左三部分切除术对肝门周围胆管癌的临床意义:与左肝切除术的评估及比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To review our experiences with left-sided hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, to compare left hepatectomy with left trisectionectomy, and to evaluate the clinical significance of left trisectionectomy from the viewpoint of surgical oncology. Background: Only 4 large case series have been reported on left trisectionectomy, with only a few patients diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, the oncologic advantage of left trisectionectomy compared with left hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is still unclear. Methods: This study involved 201 patients who underwent left-sided hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (86 trisectionectomies and 115 hepatectomies). Surgical outcome and survival were compared between the 2 types of hepatectomy. The length of the resected right posterior bile duct was also measured. Results: Patients who underwent trisectionectomy had more advanced tumors, thus requiring combined vascular and/or other organ resection. Operative time and blood loss were significantly greater in trisectionectomy than in hepatectomy; therefore, overall morbidity was significantly higher in the former (59.3% vs 33.0%, P < 0.001). Mortality was similar (1.2% vs 0.9%) in both techniques. The length of the resected supraportal right posterior bile duct was significantly longer in trisectionectomy than in hepatectomy (20.7 ± 6.4 vs 13.6 ± 5.2 mm, P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in length of the infraportal type right posterior bile duct. The percentage of negative radial and distal common bile duct margins was similar, but the percentage of negative right posterior bile duct margins was significantly higher in trisectionectomy than in hepatectomy (97.7% vs 89.6%, P = 0.027). Overall, R0 resection was achieved in 84.9% of patients with trisectionectomy and in 70.4% of patients with hepatectomy (P = 0.019). Survival rates were similar between patients with trisectionectomy and those with hepatectomy (36.8% vs 34.0% at 5-year), despite the fact that the former had more advanced disease. Conclusions: Left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, although technically demanding, can be performed with similar mortality rates as left hepatectomy. From an oncologic viewpoint, this operation can increase the number of negative proximal ductal margins, leading to a high proportion of R0 resection, and, in turn, to improved survival rates of patients with advanced left-sided perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
机译:目的:回顾我们左侧肝切除术治疗肝门周围胆管癌的经验,比较左肝切除术和左三叶切除术,并从外科肿瘤学的角度评估左三叶切除术的临床意义。背景:左三部分切除术仅报道了4个大病例系列,只有少数患者被诊断为肝门周围胆管癌。因此,与三肝切除术相比,左三部分切除术在肝门部胆管癌中的肿瘤学优势尚不清楚。方法:本研究纳入201例因肝门周围胆管癌行左侧肝切除术的患者(86例三段切除术和115例肝切除术)。比较了两种肝切除术的手术结果和生存率。还测量了切除的右后胆管的长度。结果:接受三部分切除术的患者患有更晚期的肿瘤,因此需要联合血管和/或其他器官切除术。三节切除术的手术时间和失血量明显大于肝切除术。因此,前者的总发病率显着更高(59.3%比33.0%,P <0.001)。两种技术的死亡率相似(1.2%比0.9%)。三部分切除术中切除的右上后右胆管长度比肝切除术要长得多(20.7±6.4 vs 13.6±5.2 mm,P <0.001)。但是,下型右后胆管的长度没有差异。 section骨切除远端和radial总胆管切缘阴性的百分比相似,但是三部分切除术中右后胆管切缘阴性的比例显着高于肝切除术(97.7%vs 89.6%,P = 0.027)。总体而言,三部分切除术患者中有84.9%的患者实现了R0切除,肝切除术患者中有70.4%的患者实现了R0切除(P = 0.019)。尽管三部分切除术患者与肝切除术患者的生存率相似(5年时分别为36.8%和34.0%),尽管前者的病情较晚期。结论:尽管技术上要求很高,但左三段切除术治疗肝门周围胆管癌的死亡率与左肝切除术相似。从肿瘤学的角度来看,该手术可增加负性近端导管切缘的数量,从而导致较高的R0切除率,进而提高晚期左侧肝门周围胆管癌患者的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号