首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Outpatient versus hospitalization management for uncomplicated diverticulitis: A prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial (DIVER trial)
【24h】

Outpatient versus hospitalization management for uncomplicated diverticulitis: A prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial (DIVER trial)

机译:单纯性憩室炎的门诊与住院管理:一项前瞻性,多中心随机临床试验(DIVER试验)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We compare the results of 2 different strategies for the management of patients with uncomplicated left colonic diverticulitis and to analyze differences in quality of life and economic costs. BACKGROUND: The most frequent standard management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis still is hospital admission both in Europe and United States. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized controlled trial included patients older than 18 years with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. All the patients underwent abdominal computed tomography. There were 2 strategies of management: hospitalization (group 1) and outpatient (group 2). The first dose of antibiotic was given intravenously to all patients in the emergency department and then group 1 patients were hospitalized whereas patients in group 2 were discharged. The primary end point was the treatment failure rate of the outpatient protocol and need for hospital admission. The secondary end points included quality-of-life assessment and evaluation of costs. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were randomized: 4 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 presented treatment failure without differences between the groups (P = 0.619). The overall health care cost per episode was 3 times lower in group 2, with savings of &OV0556;1124.70 per patient. No differences were observed between the groups in terms of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment is safe and effective in selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Outpatient treatment allows important costs saving to the health systems without negative influence on the quality of life of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis. Trial registration ID: EudraCT number 2008-008452-17.
机译:目的:我们比较两种不同策略治疗单纯性左结肠憩室炎的结果,并分析生活质量和经济成本的差异。背景:急性单纯性憩室炎最常见的标准管理方法仍然是在欧洲和美国住院。方法:该多中心随机对照试验纳入了18岁以上的急性单纯性憩室炎患者。所有患者均行腹部CT检查。有2种管理策略:住院(第1组)和门诊(第2组)。急诊科所有患者均静脉注射第一剂抗生素,然后第1组患者住院,第2组患者出院。主要终点是门诊治疗方案的治疗失败率和住院需求。次要终点包括生活质量评估和成本评估。结果:总共132例患者被随机分组​​:第1组4例,第2组3例出现治疗失败,两组之间无差异(P = 0.619)。第2组,每集的总体医疗保健成本降低了3倍,每位患者节省了&OV0556; 1124.70。两组之间在生活质量方面没有差异。结论:对于部分并发急性憩室炎的患者,门诊治疗是安全有效的。门诊治疗可为卫生系统节省大量费用,而对单纯性憩室炎患者的生活质量没有负面影响。试用注册ID:EudraCT号2008-008452-17。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号