首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
【24h】

Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.

机译:通过增加重复回覆来增强手术知情同意:一项多中心,随机对照临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: In this randomized, controlled, unblinded trial, we sought to test Repeat Back's (RB) effect on comprehension following informed consent discussions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: RB has been suggested as a method to improve patient comprehension when obtaining informed consent. In this technique, patients are asked to recount what they have been told in the informed consent discussion. Despite preliminary data, this practice has not been evaluated in any large scale study. METHODS: This study was conducted in 7 Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers where informed consent is obtained using iMedConsent, the VA's computer based platform. Patients scheduled for elective surgeries were randomized to RB (a module added to the iMedConsent package) or standard iMedConsent (no RB). Comprehension was tested after the informed consent using procedure-specific questionnaires. Time stamps in the iMedConsent program estimated the time spent completing the informed consent process. Provider and patient satisfaction were measured using 5-point Likert scales. Statistical comparisons of groups were performed using t-tests and chi tests. RESULTS: A total of 575 patients were enrolled. In the RB group, providers spent 2.6 minutes longer (P < 0.0001) obtaining informed consent. The mean comprehension score was significantly higher in the RB group (71.4%) versus the no RB group (68.2%, P = 0.03); the effect was greatest in carotid endarterectomy patients (RB = 73.4% vs. no RB = 67.7%, P = 0.02). Quality of decision making was rated similarly. Providers were neutral to slightly favorable regarding RB. CONCLUSIONS: RB implemented within an electronic informed consent system improved patient comprehension. The additional time required was acceptable to providers. RB should be considered as an enhancement to surgical informed consent.This clinical trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT00288899).
机译:目的:在这项随机,对照,无盲试验中,我们寻求在知情同意讨论之后测试重复回读(RB)对理解的影响。发明内容背景数据:RB已经被建议作为一种在获得知情同意的情况下提高患者理解力的方法。在这种技术中,要求患者重新叙述他们在知情同意书讨论中所讲的内容。尽管有初步数据,但这种实践尚未在任何大规模研究中得到评估。方法:本研究是在7个退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心进行的,这些中心使用VA的基于计算机的平台iMedConsent获得了知情同意。计划进行择期手术的患者被随机分为RB(iMedConsent软件包中添加的模块)或标准iMedConsent(无RB)。知情同意后,使用特定于过程的问卷对理解力进行测试。 iMedConsent程序中的时间戳估计了完成知情同意过程所花费的时间。提供者和患者满意度使用5点Likert量表进行测量。使用t检验和chi检验对各组进行统计比较。结果:共纳入575例患者。在RB组中,提供者花费了2.6分钟以上的时间(P <0.0001)以获得知情同意。 RB组的平均理解得分(71.4%)明显高于无RB组(68.2%,P = 0.03);在颈动脉内膜切除术患者中效果最大(RB = 73.4%,无RB = 67.7%,P = 0.02)。决策质量也得到了类似的评价。提供者对RB持中立或略微偏向。结论:在电子知情同意系统内实施的RB改善了患者的理解力。提供者可以接受所需的额外时间。 RB应该被认为是手术知情同意的增强。该临床试验已在http://www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册(标识符NCT00288899)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号