...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied occupational and environmental hygiene >Efficiency of final cleaning for lead-based paint abatement in indoor environments.
【24h】

Efficiency of final cleaning for lead-based paint abatement in indoor environments.

机译:在室内环境中进行最终清洁以减少含铅涂料的效率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The effectiveness of procedures used for the final indoor cleaning after active lead-based paint abatement were evaluated in a 830 ft3 test chamber. Dry and wet scraping and dry machine sanding were applied to wooden doors obtained from lead-hazard control sites. The airborne particle concentration and size distribution were monitored using a real-time particle size spectrometer. Particulates were also collected on filters and analyzed for total dust and lead. The resulting airborne lead mass was determined for each cleaning procedure, and the potential floor lead loading resulting from the dust settling was calculated. Wipe samples were collected to measure the actual floor lead loading. The effectiveness of final cleaning was evaluated first for dry abatement methods. Various cleaning work practices were tested by applying wet and dry debris sweeping as well as no sweeping in combinations with wet and dry removal of plastic sheeting. Considerable resuspension of leaded particles was detected during dry sweeping: the airborne lead mass increase ranged between 65 and 220 percent. However, this increase did not exceed 22 percent when wet sweeping was applied. Minimal or no resuspension was found when the plastic was folded with leaded debris inside (no sweeping was performed prior to the sheeting removal). During folding activity, the "clean" (uncovered) floor surface may be significantly contaminated with leaded dust from workers' shoes and cleaning tools. The first HEPA vacuuming resulted in a 15- to 20-fold decrease of the airborne lead mass; however, it was not sufficient to reduce the floor lead loading to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) clearance level of 40 microg/ft2, as determined by wipe sampling. Wet mopping following the first HEPA vacuuming was proven to be effective to reduce the lead loading significantly below 40 microg/ft2. The second HEPA vacuuming resulted in further reduction of the airborne lead mass concentration. The floor lead loading remained much lower than 40 microg/ft2. These results were confirmed in the tests when using wet scraping. Overall, the HUD-recommended cleaning protocol was found to be sufficient in reducing the floor lead loading below 40 microg/ft2. At the same time, several modifications are proposed in this study to further improve the cleaning effectiveness.
机译:在830平方英尺(3英尺)的测试室内评估了主动去除铅基油漆后用于最终室内清洁的程序的有效性。干和湿刮和干机打磨应用于从铅危害控制场所获得的木门。空气中颗粒物的浓度和粒径分布使用实时粒径谱仪进行监测。颗粒也被收集在过滤器上,并分析了总的灰尘和铅。确定每次清洁程序产生的空气中铅的质量,并计算出因粉尘沉降而导致的潜在地面铅负荷。收集擦拭样品以测量实际的地板铅负载。首先对干式减排方法评估了最终清洁的有效性。通过采用湿法和干法清扫以及不进行清扫以及湿法和干法去除塑料片的组合,测试了各种清洁工作方法。在干扫过程中检测到铅颗粒的大量重悬:空气中铅的质量增加范围为65%至220%。但是,使用湿扫时,这种增加不会超过22%。当将塑料折叠成内部有铅屑时,发现没有或只有最小的悬浮(在除去薄片之前不进行清扫)。在折叠活动期间,“清洁的”(未覆盖)地板表面可能会被工人的鞋子和清洁工具中的含铅灰尘严重污染。第一次HEPA抽真空导致空气中铅的质量减少了15到20倍;但是,通过擦拭采样确定,将地板铅负荷降低到美国住房和城市发展部(HUD)的许可水平40 microg / ft2是不够的。事实证明,在第一次HEPA抽真空之后进行湿拖把可有效地将铅负载量显着降低至40 microg / ft2以下。第二次HEPA抽真空导致空气中铅的质量浓度进一步降低。地板铅负载仍远低于40 microg / ft2。这些结果在使用湿刮法的测试中得到了证实。总体而言,发现HUD推荐的清洁方案足以将地板铅负荷降低到40 microg / ft2以下。同时,本研究提出了几种改进方案,以进一步提高清洁效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号