首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?
【24h】

Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?

机译:资源贫乏地区的围产期干预措施和生存:哪些工作有效,哪些无效,哪些需要陪审团?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Perinatal conditions make the largest contribution to the burden of disease in low-income countries. Although postneonatal mortality rates have declined, stillbirth and early neonatal mortality rates remain high in many countries in Africa and Asia, and there is a concentration of mortality around the time of birth. Our article begins by considering differences in the interpretation of 'intervention' to improve perinatal survival. We identify three types of INTERVENTION: a single action, a collection of actions delivered in a package and a broader social or system approach. We use this classification to summarise the findings of recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. After describing the growing evidence base for the effectiveness of community-based perinatal care, we discuss current concerns about integration: of women's and children's health programmes, of community-based and institutional care, and of formal and informal sector human resources. We end with some thoughts on the complexity of choices confronting women and their families in low-income countries, particularly in view of the growth in non-government and private sector healthcare.
机译:在低收入国家,围产期状况对疾病负担的贡献最大。尽管新生儿的死亡率下降了,但非洲和亚洲许多国家的死产和早期新生儿死亡率仍然很高,并且出生时的死亡率集中。我们的文章首先考虑了“干预”以提高围产期生存率的解释上的差异。我们确定干预的三种类型:单一行动,一揽子行动中采取的行动的集合以及更广泛的社会或系统方法。我们使用这种分类来总结最近的系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。在描述了越来越多的基于社区的围产期护理有效性的证据基础之后,我们讨论了当前对融合的关注:妇女和儿童保健计划,基于社区和机构的护理以及正规和非正规部门的人力资源。最后,我们对低收入国家妇女及其家庭面临的选择的复杂性有一些想法,特别是鉴于非政府和私营部门医疗保健的增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号