首页> 外文期刊>Arborist News >Mew Research Sparks Controversy over CPR Technique
【24h】

Mew Research Sparks Controversy over CPR Technique

机译:Mew Research引发有关CPR技术的争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

POP QUIZ! You and your crew are finishing up a full day's work at a client site. One of your crew members collapses as he drags the last load of brush to the chipper. You know that he has had heart problems in the past, and you suspect that he's in cardiac arrest. You send someone to call emergency rescue services. What do you do next? Most people would begin aiiministering cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), following the techniques learned in a CPR training course: alternating artificial respiration with chest compressions. But new research suggests that chest compressions alone can be just as effective.
机译:突击测验!您和您的工作人员正在客户现场完成一整天的工作。您的一名乘员将最后一刷刷子拖到削片机上时倒塌了。您知道他过去有过心脏问题,并且怀疑他处于心脏骤停状态。您派人呼叫紧急救援服务。下一步你要怎么做?遵循CPR培训课程中学到的技术,大多数人会开始减少心肺复苏(CPR):交替进行人工呼吸和按压胸部。但新的研究表明,仅靠胸部按压同样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号