首页> 外文期刊>Arboricultural Journal: The International Journal of Urban Forestry >CAN A MORE DISCIPLINED APPROACH TO TREE APPRAISAL INFORM DEVELOPMENT SITE SURVEYS AND TREE PRESERVATION DECISIONS - AND VICE VERSA?
【24h】

CAN A MORE DISCIPLINED APPROACH TO TREE APPRAISAL INFORM DEVELOPMENT SITE SURVEYS AND TREE PRESERVATION DECISIONS - AND VICE VERSA?

机译:可以采用更纪律的方法对树木进行评估,以告知开发场所调查和树木保存的决定吗?反之亦然?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some of the benefits gained from applying a rigour of process to tree valuation could be exported to wider forms of tree appraisal in the UK, such as development site surveys. Indeed, surveyors may already use depreciation methods intuitively, but unconsciously, on development sites. The advantage of unconscious usage is that practitioners have a pre-existing familiarity with these broader appraisal methods; the disadvantage of unconscious practice is that the process remains unfocussed and lacking in internal coherence - no 'grammar' of process. Alignment with more universal methods of quality categorisation than those currently employed in UK practice (i.e. British Standard 5837: 2005 Trees in relation to construction), could lead to a greater transparency of process and greater consistency in consultants' reports. Cross-fertilisation with more disciplined appraisal techniques, such as CTLA's Trunk Formula Method (TFM), is proposed, rather than straight substitution by them. A full TFM appraisal may be too detailed an exercise for each individual tree on a development site; nor is the financial valuation of each tree proposed. Rather, the proposal is that the TFM depreciation factors (Species, Condition, Location) inform the future review of BS5837's quality categorisation process, imparting to it, the basic grammar that is currently lacking. Tree officers could also develop this grammar to more readily justify Tree Preservation Order designations, beyond essentially visual criteria, and through the addition of the monetary factors, when seeking high-level fines. Despite 40 years of amenity tree valuation in the UK, arboriculturalists remain singularly unversed in the broader appraisal language. Familiarisation with and adaptation of CTLA methods, which draw upon this grammar, could help expose arboriculturalists to the language and allow them to communicate valuations more universally to the other professions and industries to which arboriculture must increasingly relate.
机译:在树木评估中采用严格的流程所获得的一些好处可以出口到英国更广泛的树木评估形式,例如开发场地调查。确实,测量师可能已经在开发站点上直观但不自觉地使用了折旧方法。无意识使用的好处是,从业人员对这些更广泛的评估方法已经很熟悉。无意识练习的缺点是过程仍然没有重点并且缺乏内部连贯性-过程没有“语法”。与目前在英国实践中采用的质量分类方法相比,采用更通用的质量分类方法(例如,英国标准5837:2005与建筑相关的树木),可以提高流程的透明度和顾问报告的一致性。提出了使用更严格的评估技术(例如CTLA的躯干公式法(TFM))进行杂交的方法,而不是直接用它们替代。全面的TFM评估可能过于详尽,无法针对开发站点上的每棵树进行演练。也没有提出每棵树的财务评估。相反,建议是TFM折旧因子(种类,条件,位置)为BS5837质量分类过程的未来回顾提供信息,并赋予它当前缺少的基本语法。树木管理员还可以发展这种语法,以便在寻求高额罚款时,从本质上超越视觉标准,并通过增加金钱因素,更容易证明树木保护令的合理性。尽管在英国进行了40年的美化树木评估,但树木栽培专家仍然对广义评估语言一无所知。借助这种语法,对CTLA方法的熟悉和改编可以帮助使树木栽培专家了解该语言,并使他们能够将价值评估更广泛地与树木栽培必须与之相关的其他专业和行业进行交流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号