...
首页> 外文期刊>Arboricultural Journal: The International Journal of Urban Forestry >A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMUNITY GARDEN SYSTEMS IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES AND THEIR ROLE IN CREATING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMUNITY GARDEN SYSTEMS IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES AND THEIR ROLE IN CREATING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

机译:德国和美国社区花园系统的比较研究及其在建立可持续社区中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Brownfield and derelict sites are a global issue and within inner city neighbourhoods they are often associated with poverty, crime, drugs and neglect. In the current climate of Agenda 21 these negative issues are not conducive to the issue of sustainability. This poses the question of what can be done in these areas to reduce these problems and help create more sustainable communities. A comparative study explores the benefits and key features of German allotment gardens and American community gardens with a view to their possible implementation into inner city derelict and Brownfield regeneration in the UK and other countries. Their benefits can be appreciated through comparison of the two models, whilst considering whether community gardens havea role in helping to create sustainable communities that positively impact the negative social, economic and environmental issues associated with derelict sites in inner city neighbourhoods.
机译:布朗菲尔德和被遗弃的遗址是一个全球性的问题,在市区内居民区,它们通常与贫困,犯罪,毒品和忽视有关。在当前的《 21世纪议程》气氛中,这些负面问题不利于可持续性问题。这就提出了在这些领域可以采取哪些措施来减少这些问题并帮助建立更可持续的社区的问题。一项比较研究探讨了德国分配花园和美国社区花园的好处和主要特征,以期在英国和其他国家将其应用到废弃的内城和布朗菲尔德的复兴中。通过比较这两种模型,可以考虑它们的好处,同时考虑社区花园是否在帮助创建可持续社区方面发挥作用,这些社区对与内部城市社区废弃地相关的负面社会,经济和环境问题产生积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号