首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >Ecosystem services of allotment and community gardens: A Leipzig, Germany case study
【24h】

Ecosystem services of allotment and community gardens: A Leipzig, Germany case study

机译:生态系统服务分配和社区花园:莱比锡,德国案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Allotment gardens and community gardens provide important ecosystem services to urban communities, such as local climate and water regulation, as well as habitat provision for biodiversity. Using the city of Leipzig as a case study, we assess the effect of urban gardening type and intensity of management on ecosystem services and biodiversity by comparing allotment and community gardens. Employing a stratified sampling design, we assessed 30 allotment plots of different management intensity, including vacant plots, and six adjacent community gardens along a gradient of urbanity, using in-depth field surveys, remote sensing analyses and interviews. Our results show a bimodal relationship of overall vascular plant species richness with management intensity with highest species richness in medium intensively-managed plots, as they provide space for both cultivated edible and ornamental species as well as native, spontaneous species. In comparison to allotment gardens, community gardens provide a higher ratio of permeable soil surface and a slightly higher microbial soil activity, implying important differences in water regulation and nutrient cycling properties. With regard to climate regulation, old mature trees make a considerable contribution to above ground carbon storage, but are largely restricted to communal areas of the allotment estates due to code regulation. Based on our results, we discuss the impact of allotment gardening association codes and garden type and ways forward for gardeners and urban planners to promote biodiversity and ecosystem services provision. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:销售花园和社区花园为城市社区提供重要的生态系统服务,如当地的气候和水监管,以及生物多样性的栖息地规定。利用莱比锡市为例,我们通过比较分配和社区花园来评估城市园艺类型和管理强度对生态系统服务和生物多样性的影响。采用分层采样设计,我们评估了30个不同管理强度的分配地块,包括空置地块,沿着城市的梯度,偏远的现场调查,遥感分析和访谈等六个相邻的社区花园。我们的结果表明,整个血管植物物种具有管理强度的血管植物物种的双峰关系,具有中等强化管理的地块中的最高种类丰富性,因为它们为栽培食用和装饰物种以及原生自发性提供空间。与配给花园相比,社区花园提供了更高的渗透性土壤比率和略高的微生物土壤活性,这意味着对水调节和营养循环性能的重要差异。关于气候调节,旧成熟树木对地面碳储存作出了相当大的贡献,但由于代码规则,主要限于分配恏的公共区域。根据我们的结果,我们讨论了分配园艺协会代码和花园类型的影响以及向园林和城市规划人员向前发展的方式,促进生物多样性和生态系统服务。 (c)2017 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号