首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >Should old dog trainers learn new tricks? The efficiency of the Do as I do method and shaping/clicker training method to train dogs.
【24h】

Should old dog trainers learn new tricks? The efficiency of the Do as I do method and shaping/clicker training method to train dogs.

机译:老狗训练师应该学习新的技巧吗? “照做”方法和整形/答题器训练方法训练狗的效率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite evidence that dogs are skilful in acquiring information socially from humans and are able to copy the actions of a human demonstrator, formal dog-training methods have traditionally relied only on individual learning (operant and classical conditioning). We compared the efficiency of the 'Do as I do' method (Topal et al., 2006), which relies on social learning, with that of a training method that relies on individual learning (shaping/clicker training, Skinner, 1951) to teach dogs three different kinds of object-related actions. In order to control for the comparability of the previous training experiences of our subjects, we tested experienced dog-owner dyads that had previously achieved a certificate for either type of training (Do as I do and shaping/clicker training). They were tested upon training three different novel actions: simple, complex and sequences of two actions, in three separate sessions, using the training method they were certified for. In each case the owners had 15 min for accomplishing the task of training the dogs to perform the predetermined action. We used the latency of first occurrence and the number of dyads that were successful within 15 min as measures of training success. While we did not find a significant difference between the two training methods with regard to simple actions, we found that subjects using the Do as I do method outperformed those using shaping/clicker training in the case of complex actions and sequences of two actions. This study is the first to formalize a method based on the Do as I do protocol for training dogs and to assess its efficiency by comparing it with shaping/clicker training. We acknowledge that many factors can influence the success of different training paradigms; however, these results provide new insights for the applied dog training techniques by suggesting the usefulness of social learning in addition to the widely used methods that rely on individual associative learning.
机译:尽管有证据表明狗可以熟练地从人类社交中获取信息,并且能够模仿人类示威者的行为,但传统上,正规的狗训练方法仅依赖于个人学习(操作和经典条件)。我们比较了依赖社会学习的“按需做”方法(Topal等人,2006)和依赖于个人学习的训练方法(定型/点击训练,Skinner,1951)的效率。教狗三种与物体有关的动作。为了控制我们以前的训练经历的可比性,我们测试了经验丰富的狗主人二元组,这些二元组以前已经获得了两种训练类型的证书(“照做”和“塑形/答题器”训练)。在训练三个不同的新颖动作(简单,复杂和两个动作的顺序)的过程中,使用经过认证的训练方法,在三个不同的阶段对它们进行了测试。在每种情况下,主人都有15分钟的时间来完成训练狗执行预定动作的任务。我们将首次出现的潜伏期和15分钟内成功的二分位数作为训练成功的量度。虽然我们没有发现两种训练方法在简单动作方面有显着差异,但是我们发现,在复杂动作和两个动作序列的情况下,使用“按原样做”方法的对象要优于使用整形/答题器训练的对象。这项研究是第一个形式化基于Do do I do协议训练狗的方法,并通过与整形/答题器训练进行比较来评估其效率的方法。我们承认,许多因素会影响不同训练范式的成功;但是,这些结果通过建议社交学习以及依赖于个体联想学习的广泛使用的方法,为社交犬的训练技术提供了新的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号