首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >Relationship between behavioural tests and agonistic interactions at different age levels in pigs
【24h】

Relationship between behavioural tests and agonistic interactions at different age levels in pigs

机译:猪行为测试与不同年龄水平激动作用之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Fighting among pigs is a normal behavioural pattern to establish a stable rank order. Enhanced aggressive behaviour in pigs in groups lead to increasing stress and injuries especially in mixing situations used as a common procedure in modern pig production systems. In such systems, it is usually not possible to avoid re-housing with unacquainted conspecifics. Hence, due to the lavish analysis of direct or video observations of the agonistic interactions in such mixing situations, there is a necessity to receive easy measurable and practical indicators for predicting individual agonistic behaviour. Possible indicators are standardised behavioural tests such as the backtest and the human approach test. The backtest was performed twice. In each test, the pigs were laid on their backs and held loosely for one minute (n = 1382). The number of escape attempts (NEA) was recorded. In addition to this test, a human approach test was performed four times with weaned pigs (n = 1318) and once with gilts (n = 272). Here, the stockperson recorded the latency of the pigs to approach and touch the person, i.e. the latency count (LC). The agonistic interactions were recorded in a video observation period of 17 h while the traits number of fights (NF) and number of initiated fights (IF) were recorded in mixtures of weaned pigs (n = 1111), growing pigs (n = 446) and gilts (n = 279). The estimations of phenotypic and genetic correlations between these different traits were carried out with animal models in bivariate analyses. The IF trait of weaned pigs and NEA were slightly positively correlated (r(g) = 0.18). Pigs which initiated more fights after weaning had more escape attempts in the backtests. However, there were negative genetic correlations between the agonistic interactions traits NF and IF traits and the NEA backtest trait of growing pigs (r(g) = -0.14 and r(g) = -0.28). The genetic relation between the agonistic NF and IF traits of weaned pigs and the human approach test LC trait of weaned pigs were on a medium level (r(g) = -0.50 and r(g) = -0.45). The genetic correlations between IF and NF of growing pigs and gilts and the human approach test LC trait in weaned pigs were lower but also negatively correlated. Hence, pigs with more NF and IF in mixing had shorter latencies during the human approach tests. Concluding, the backtest and the human approach test might be able to predict the agonistic behaviour of pigs in mixing situations. Nevertheless, the reliability of the predictions of the behavioural tests depends on the age of the pigs at mixing and the previous experiences of these animals. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:在猪之间打架是建立稳定等级秩序的正常行为模式。成组的猪增强攻击行为会导致压力和伤害增加,尤其是在现代生猪生产系统中通常使用的混合情况下。在这样的系统中,通常无法避免使用不熟悉的规范重新封装。因此,由于在这种混合情况下对激动剂相互作用的直接或视频观察进行了大量分析,因此有必要接收易于测量且实用的指标来预测个体激动剂行为。可能的指标是标准化的行为测试,例如回溯测试和人工进近测试。回测执行了两次。在每个测试中,将猪放倒在背上并松散地保持一分钟(n = 1382)。记录了逃生尝试次数(NEA)。除此测试外,对断奶的猪(n = 1318)进行了四次人类进场测试,对后备母猪(n = 272)进行了一次人类进场测试。在这里,饲养员记录了猪接近并触摸该人的潜伏期,即潜伏期计数(LC)。在17小时的视频观察期内记录了激动剂的相互作用,而在断奶猪(n = 1111),生长猪(n = 446)的混合物中记录了性状数量(NF)和引发的数量(IF)。和小母猪(n = 279)。在双变量分析中,使用动物模型对这些不同性状之间的表型和遗传相关性进行了估计。断奶仔猪的IF性状与NEA呈正相关(r(g)= 0.18)。断奶后引发更多争斗的猪在回测中有更多的逃避尝试。然而,成年猪的激动相互作用性状NF和IF性状与NEA回测性状之间存在负遗传相关性(r(g)= -0.14和r(g)= -0.28)。断奶猪的激动性NF和IF性状与断奶猪的人工进出测试LC性状之间的遗传关系处于中等水平(r(g)= -0.50和r(g)= -0.45)。生长中的仔猪和后备母猪的IF和NF之间的遗传相关性与断奶猪的人类进近试验LC性状较低,但也呈负相关。因此,在人工进近测试中,混合有更多NF和IF的猪的潜伏期较短。最后,回溯测试和人工进近测试可能能够预测猪在混合情况下的激动行为。尽管如此,行为测试的预测的可靠性取决于混合时猪的年龄和这些动物的先前经历。 (C)2016由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号