首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of a virosome influenza vaccine with those of a subunit influenza vaccine in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.
【24h】

Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of a virosome influenza vaccine with those of a subunit influenza vaccine in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

机译:病毒性流感疫苗与亚单位流感疫苗的免疫原性和安全性在小儿囊性纤维化患者中的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a single-dose regimen and a two-dose regimen of a trivalent virosome influenza vaccine (Inflexal Berna V) with those of a trivalent subunit influenza vaccine (Influvac) in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF). In an open, randomized, multicenter study with parallel groups, 11 young children with CF (1 to 6 years old) and 53 older children and adolescents with CF (>6 years old) were randomly assigned to one of the following immunization regimens: virosome vaccine at 0.5 ml on study day 0 or 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 or a standard regimen of subunit vaccine, i. e., 0.5 ml on day 0 for older children and 0.25 ml on days 0 and 28 for younger children. Safety assessments, i.e., recording of systemic and local adverse events (AEs) and vital signs, were made for a 5-day observation period after each immunization. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers were determined at baseline and 4 weeks after the single-dose and the two-dose immunizations, respectively. Immunogenicity was assessed according to the criteria of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). Both vaccines induced comparable HI antibody titers. Seroconversion (> or =4-fold rise in HI antibody titers, reaching a titer of > or =1:40) was achieved in 41 to 100% of the participants. Seroprotection (HI titer, > or =1:40) and a >2.5-fold increase in geometric mean titers were achieved in 100% of the participants. Thus, all three EMEA requirements for influenza vaccine efficacy were met by all treatment groups and for both vaccines. The virosome vaccine, when administered as a single dose, seemed to induce superior immunogenicity compared with the standard pediatric two-dose regimen. Totals of 42 and 57% of vaccinees receiving virosome and subunit vaccines, respectively, reported at least one local AE (predominantly pain). Totals of 84 and 71% of subjects receiving virosome and subunit vaccines, respectively, complained in response to questions of at least one systemic AE (mainly cough, fatigue, coryza, or headache). The majority of events were mild or moderate and lasted 1 or 2 days only. No obvious relationship was found between AE reporting rate and vaccine formulation, age group, or dose regimen. The relatively high AE reporting rate seemed to be partly related to the symptomatology of the underlying CF disease. In summary, the virosome and subunit vaccines induced in both age groups and against all three influenza strains an efficient immune response and were well tolerated by the children and adolescents with CF.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较三价病毒体流感疫苗(Inflexal Berna V)与三价亚单位流感疫苗(Influvac)在儿童和青少年中的单剂量方案和两剂方案的免疫原性和安全性。囊性纤维化(CF)。在一项平行的开放,随机,多中心研究中,将11名CF儿童(1至6岁)和53名CF儿童(大于6岁)的青少年随机分配至以下免疫方案之一:病毒体在研究的第0天接种0.5 ml的疫苗,或在第0和28天接种0.25 ml的疫苗,或亚单位疫苗的标准方案,即例如,年龄较大的孩子在第0天为0.5毫升,年龄较小的孩子在第0和28天为0.25毫升。每次免疫后的5天观察期内,进行安全性评估,即记录全身和局部不良事件(AE)和生命体征。在单次和两次免疫后分别在基线和4周时测定血凝抑制(HI)效价。根据欧洲药品评估机构(EMEA)的标准评估了免疫原性。两种疫苗均诱导了类似的HI抗体效价。在41%至100%的参与者中实现了血清转化(HI抗体效价升高>或= 4倍,达到>或= 1:40的效价)。 100%的参与者达到了血清保护(HI效价,>或= 1:40)和几何平均效价> 2.5倍的增长。因此,所有治疗组和两种疫苗都满足了对流感疫苗功效的三个EMEA要求。与标准的儿科两剂方案相比,病毒体疫苗单剂给药时似乎具有更高的免疫原性。分别有42%和57%的疫苗接种者接种了病毒体和亚单位疫苗,至少报告了一种局部AE(主要是疼痛)。分别接受病毒体和亚单位疫苗的受试者中,分别有84%和71%的受试者对至少一种全身性AE(主要是咳嗽,疲劳,鼻炎或头痛)的问题做出了回应。大多数事件为轻度或中度,仅持续1或2天。在不良事件报告率与疫苗制剂,年龄组或剂量方案之间没有发现明显的关系。相对较高的不良事件报告率似乎部分与潜在的CF疾病的症状有关。总之,在两个年龄组和针对所有三种流感病毒株诱导的病毒体和亚单位疫苗均具有有效的免疫应答,并且儿童和青少年CF耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号