...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Spectroscopy: Society for Applied Spectroscopy >Correspondence Regarding the Article 'On the Nature of the Evanescent Wave' (Appl. Spectrosc. 2013. 67[2]:126-130). How 'Total' is Total Reflection from Powdered Samples?
【24h】

Correspondence Regarding the Article 'On the Nature of the Evanescent Wave' (Appl. Spectrosc. 2013. 67[2]:126-130). How 'Total' is Total Reflection from Powdered Samples?

机译:关于“ On逝波的性质”一文的通讯(Appl。Spectrosc。2013. 67 [2]:126-130)。粉末状样品的总反射率是多少?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With great interest I read the article by Milan Milosevic, "On the Nature of the Evanescent Wave." This article fills an important gap in the description of an evanescent wave to a broad audience, centered mainly in the field of applicants of total reflection spectroscopy. As a member of this community, I feel obliged to add a comment to the article. My comment concerns the statement that if the evanescent wave, "were a propagating wave, it would be subject to scattering in those cases where medium 2 is a powder, and, therefore, the supercritical internal reflection of a non-absorbing powdered sample would not be total." With the sentence "It is" after the above-cited statement, the author generated the impression that there is no scattering of evanescent waves. There is absolutely no doubt about the fact that an evanescent wave is a non-propagating wave. On the other hand, it is a well established fact, both experimentally and theoretically, that an evanescent wave can indeed be scattered by non-absorbing objects. An overview of light scattering of evanescent waves was given by Sigel. In particular, the dynamic light-scattering works on colloids all show results in which the diffusion coefficient of the colloids are in some sense related to the bulk diffusion coefficient, which, again, can leave absolutely no doubt that the scattering is caused by particles diffusing in the rarer medium. (I should only briefly mention the routine use of gracing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD), to characterize the top layers of crystalline materials by diffraction from an evanescent X-ray wave, e.g., the works of Renner et al.). These experimental and theoretical results do not, however, necessarily contradict the main conclusions in the Milosevic work. Only the statement that a wave with the nature of an evanescent wave cannot be scattered is not correct.
机译:我怀着极大的兴趣阅读了米兰·米洛舍维奇(Milan Milosevic)的文章“ On逝波的本质”。本文填补了在向广大读者描述e逝波方面的一个重要空白,主要是在全反射光谱学的应用领域中。作为该社区的成员,我有义务在文章中添加评论。我的评论涉及这样的说法:如果e逝波“是传播波,则在介质2是粉末的情况下会受到散射,因此,非吸收性粉末样品的超临界内反射不会发生”总计。”在上述陈述之后,作者使用句子“ It is”,给人的印象是van逝波没有散射。 e逝波是非传播波这一事实是绝对毫无疑问的。另一方面,在实验和理论上,已经确定的事实是van逝波确实可以被非吸收性物体散射。 Sigel给出了e逝波光散射的概述。特别地,对胶体的动态光散射工作均显示出这样的结果,其中胶体的扩散系数在某种意义上与体扩散系数有关,这再次完全可以毫无疑问地认为,散射是由粒子扩散引起的。在稀有介质中。 (我只应简要介绍一下格拉斯入射X射线衍射(GIXD)的常规用法,以通过from逝X射线波的衍射来表征晶体材料的顶层,例如Renner等人的著作)。但是,这些实验和理论结果不一定与米洛舍维奇工作的主要结论相矛盾。只有不能消散具有van逝波性质的波的说法是不正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号