首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soft Computing >Improving the performance of multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function models with a decision tree model to predict flow variables in a sharp 90 degrees bend
【24h】

Improving the performance of multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function models with a decision tree model to predict flow variables in a sharp 90 degrees bend

机译:借助决策树模型来预测90度急弯中的流量变量,从而提高多层感知器和径向基函数模型的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The use of artificial intelligence methods in different hydraulic sciences has become conventional in recent years. In this study, two artificial neural networks (ANN), namely multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) models were modified with decision trees (DT) and designed as two new hybrid models, namely DT-MLP and DT-RBF. The performance of the proposed hybrid (DT-MLP and DT-RBF) and simple (MLP and RBF) models was compared for velocity and water surface prediction in sharp 90 degrees bends. The experimental data for 5 different hydraulic conditions in a sharp 90 degrees bend were used to train and test the models. In velocity prediction, the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and relative error (delta) values decreased with the DT-MLP model compared to the MLP model by 16%, 9% and 0.17% and the values of DT-RBF reduced by 11%, 7% and 0.11% compared to the RBF model, respectively. For water surface prediction, the MAE, RMSE and delta errors decreased with the DT-MLP model by 5.2%, 5.5% and 0.095% compared with MLP and with the DT-RBF model the errors decreased by 20%, 23% and 0.5% compared with RBF, respectively. Using the new proposed hybrid algorithms based on decision trees enhanced the simple MLP and RBF models' performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:近年来,在不同的水力科学领域中使用人工智能方法已成为常规。在这项研究中,使用决策树(DT)修改了两个人工神经网络(ANN),即多层感知器(MLP)和径向基函数(RBF)模型,并将其设计为两个新的混合模型,即DT-MLP和DT-RBF 。比较了拟议的混合模型(DT-MLP和DT-RBF)和简单模型(MLP和RBF)的性能,以预测90度急弯中的速度和水面。在90度急转弯中使用5种不同水力条件的实验数据用于训练和测试模型。在速度预测中,与MLP模型相比,DT-MLP模型的平均绝对误差(MAE),均方根误差(RMSE)和相对误差(delta)值降低了16%,9%和0.17%与RBF模型相比,DT-RBF的百分比分别降低了11%,7%和0.11%。对于水面预测,与MLP相比,DT-MLP模型的MAE,RMSE和增量误差降低了5.2%,5.5%和0.095%,而DT-RBF模型的误差降低了20%,23%和0.5%与RBF分别比较。使用新提出的基于决策树的混合算法增强了简单的MLP和RBF模型的性能。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号