...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soft Computing >Extremal optimization vs. learning automata: Strategies for spin selection in portfolio selection problems
【24h】

Extremal optimization vs. learning automata: Strategies for spin selection in portfolio selection problems

机译:极值优化与学习自动机:投资组合选择问题中自旋选择的策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nowadays, various imitations of natural processes are used to solve challenging optimization problems faster and more accurately. Spin glass based optimization, specifically, has shown strong local search capability and parallel processing. But, spin glasses have a low rate of convergence since they use Monte Carlo simulation techniques such as simulated annealing (SA). Here, we propose two algorithms that combine the long range effect in spin glasses with extremal optimization (EO-SA) and learning automata (LA-SA). Instead of arbitrarily flipping spins at each step, these two strategies aim to choose the next spin and selectively exploiting the optimization landscape. As shown in this paper, this selection strategy can lead to faster rate of convergence and improved performance. The resulting two algorithms are then used to solve portfolio selection problem that is a non-polynomial (NP) complete problem. Comparison of test results indicates that the two algorithms, while being very different in strategy, provide similar performance and reach comparable probability distributions for spin selection. Furthermore, experiments show there is no difference in speed of LA-SA or EO-SA for glasses with fewer spins, but EO-SA responds much better than LA-SA for large glasses. This is confirmed by tests results of five of the world's major stock markets. In the last, the convergence speed is compared to other heuristic methods such as Neural Network (NN), Tabu Search (TS), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to approve the truthfulness of proposed methods.
机译:如今,各种自然过程的模仿被用来更快,更准确地解决具有挑战性的优化问题。具体而言,基于旋转玻璃的优化已显示出强大的局部搜索能力和并行处理能力。但是,自旋玻璃使用诸如模拟退火(SA)之类的蒙特卡罗模拟技术,因此收敛速度很低。在这里,我们提出了两种算法,它们结合了旋转眼镜的远距离效果与极值优化(EO-SA)和学习自动机(LA-SA)。这两个策略不是选择在每个步骤上随意翻转旋转,而是选择下一个旋转并有选择地利用优化环境。如本文所示,这种选择策略可以加快收敛速度​​并提高性能。然后将所得的两个算法用于解决投资组合选择问题,该问题是非多项式(NP)完全问题。测试结果的比较表明,这两种算法虽然在策略上有很大差异,但它们提供了相似的性能,并且达到了自旋选择可比较的概率分布。此外,实验表明,旋转次数较少的眼镜,LA-SA或EO-SA的速度没有差异,但对于大型眼镜,EO-SA的响应要好于LA-SA。全球五个主要股票市场的测试结果证实了这一点。最后,将收敛速度与其他启发式方法(如神经网络(NN),禁忌搜索(TS)和遗传算法(GA))进行比较,以证明所提出方法的真实性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号