首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Comparative study of different numerical models of packed bed thermal energy storage systems
【24h】

Comparative study of different numerical models of packed bed thermal energy storage systems

机译:填充床储热系统不同数值模型的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents, compares and validates two different mathematical models of packed bed storage with PCM, more specifically the heat transfer during charge of the PCM. The first numerical model is a continuous model based on the Brinkman equation and the second numerical model treats the PCM capsules as individual particles (energy equation model). Using the Brinkman model the flow field inside the porous media and the heat transfer mechanisms present in the packed bed systems can be described. On the other hand, using the energy equation model the temperature gradient inside the PCM capsules can be analysed. Both models are validated with experimental data generated by the authors. The experimental set up consists mainly of a cylindrical storage tank with a capacity of 3.73 L full of spherically encapsulated PCM. The PCM used has a storage capacity of 175 kJ/kg between -2-13℃. The results from the energy equation model show a basic understanding of cold charging. Moreover, three different Nu correlations found in the literature were analysed and compared. All of them showed the same temperature profile of the PCM capsules; hence any of them could be used in future models. The comparison between both mathematical models indicated that free convection is not as important as forced convection in the studied case.
机译:本文介绍,比较和验证了PCM填充床存储的两种不同数学模型,更具体地说是PCM充电过程中的热传递。第一个数值模型是基于Brinkman方程的连续模型,第二个数值模型将PCM胶囊视为单个粒子(能量方程模型)。使用Brinkman模型,可以描述多孔介质内部的流场和填充床系统中存在的传热机制。另一方面,使用能量方程模型可以分析PCM胶囊内部的温度梯度。这两个模型都使用作者生成的实验数据进行了验证。实验装置主要由一个容量为3.73 L的圆柱形储罐构成,罐中装有球形封装的PCM。所使用的PCM在-2-13℃之间的存储容量为175 kJ / kg。能量方程模型的结果显示了对冷充的基本了解。此外,对文献中发现的三种不同的Nu相关性进行了分析和比较。它们都显示出与PCM胶囊相同的温度曲线;因此它们中的任何一个都可以在未来的模型中使用。两种数学模型之间的比较表明,在研究的情况下,自由对流不如强制对流重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号