...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood: The Journal of the American Society of Hematology >Favorable effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia restricted to dose escalation of cytarabine
【24h】

Favorable effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in remission induction of acute myeloid leukemia restricted to dose escalation of cytarabine

机译:粒细胞集落刺激因子引发的急性髓样白血病缓解诱导中阿糖胞苷剂量升高的有利作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The clinical value of chemotherapy sensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with G-CSF priming has remained controversial. Cytarabine is a key constituent of remission induction chemotherapy. The effect of G-CSF priming has not been investigated in relationship with variable dose levels of cytarabine.We randomized 917 AML patients to receive G-CSF (456 patients) or no G-CSF (461 patients) at the days of chemotherapy. In the initial part of the study, 406 patients were also randomized between 2 cytarabine regimens comparing conventional-dose (199 patients) versus escalated-dose (207 patients) cytarabine in cycles 1 and 2. We found that patients after induction chemotherapy plus G-CSF had similar overall survival (43% vs 40%, P = .88), event-free survival (37% vs 31%, P = .29), and relapse rates (34% vs 36%, P = .77) at 5 years as those not receiving G-CSF. However, patients treated with the escalated-dose cytarabine regimen benefited from G-CSF priming, with improved event-free survival (P = .01) and overall survival (P = .003), compared with patients without G-CSF undergoing escalated-dose cytarabine treatment. A significant survival advantage of sensitizing AML for chemotherapy with G-CSF was not apparent in the entire study group, but it was seen in patients treated with escalated-dose cytarabine during remission induction. The HOVON-42 study is registered under The Netherlands Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl) as #NTR230.
机译:G-CSF引发对急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)的化学疗法致敏的临床价值仍存在争议。阿糖胞苷是缓解诱导化疗的关键组成部分。尚未与阿糖胞苷剂量水平的变化相关地研究G-CSF引发的效果。我们将917例AML患者随机分为化疗当天接受G-CSF(456例)或不接受G-CSF(461例)。在研究的最初阶段,在第1和第2周期中,将406例患者随机分为2种阿糖胞苷方案,比较常规剂量(199例患者)和递增剂量(207例)阿糖胞苷。我们发现诱导化疗加G- CSF的总体生存率相似(43%vs 40%,P = 0.88),无事件生存率(37%vs 31%,P = 0.29)和复发率(34%vs 36%,P = 0.77)。未接受G-CSF者5年。但是,与无G-CSF的患者接受逐步加药治疗相比,接受递增剂量阿糖胞苷方案治疗的患者受益于G-CSF引发,无事件生存期(P = .01)和总体生存率(P = .003)有所改善。剂量阿糖胞苷治疗。在整个研究组中,尚不明显地发现AML对G-CSF化疗具有明显的生存优势,但在缓解期诱导用递增剂量阿糖胞苷治疗的患者中可以看到。 HOVON-42研究已在荷兰审判注册处(www.trialregister.nl)注册为#NTR230。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号