...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Effect of an auditory feedback substitution, tactilo-kinesthetic, or visual feedback on kinematics of pouring water from kettle into cup
【24h】

Effect of an auditory feedback substitution, tactilo-kinesthetic, or visual feedback on kinematics of pouring water from kettle into cup

机译:听觉反馈替代,触觉动觉或视觉反馈对将水从水壶倒入杯中的运动学的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pouring hot water from a kettle into a cup may prove a hazardous task, especially for the elderly or the visually-impaired. Individuals with deteriorating eyesight may endanger their hands by performing this task with both hands, relaying on tactilo-kinesthetic feedback (TKF). Auditory feedback (AF) may allow them to perform the task singlehandedly, thereby reducing the risk for injury. However since relying on an AF is not intuitive and requires practice, we aimed to determine if AF supplied during the task of pouring water can be used naturally as visual feedback (VF) following practice. For this purpose, we quantified, in young healthy sighted subjects (n = 20), the performance and kinematics of pouring water in the presence of three isolated feedbacks: visual, tactilo-kinesthetic, or auditory. There were no significant differences between the weights of spilled water in the AF condition compared to the TKF condition in the first, fifth or thirteenth trials. The subjectively-reported difficulty levels of using the TKF and the AF were significantly reduced between the first and thirteenth trials for both TKF (p = 0.01) and AF (p = 0.001). Trunk rotation during the first trial using the TKF was significantly lower than the trunk rotation while using VF. Also, shoulder adduction during the first trial using the TKF was significantly higher than the shoulder adduction while using the VF. During the AF trials, the median travel distance of the tip of the kettle was significantly reduced in the first trials so that in the thirtieth trial it did not differ significantly from the median travel distance during the thirtieth trial using TKF and VF. The maximal velocity of the tip of the kettle was constant for each of the feedback 'conditions but was higher in 10 cm s(-1) using VF than TKF, which was higher in 10 cm s-1 from using AF. The smoothness of movement of the TKF and AF conditions, expressed by the normalized jerk score (NJSM), was one and two orders of magnitude higher from the VF, respectively. The median NJSM then decreased significantly by the fifth trial. Monitoring in-house activity via motion capture and classification of movements, i.e. liquid pouring, can assist with daily activities via AF. As a built-in feature in a smart home, this task-specific AF may prevent burn injuries of the visually-impaired. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
机译:将水壶中的热水倒入杯子可能会是一项危险的工作,特别是对于老年人或视障人士而言。视力恶化的人可能会通过双手触觉-动觉反馈(TKF)来执行此任务,从而危及双手。听觉反馈(AF)可使他们单手执行任务,从而降低受伤风险。但是,由于依靠自动对焦不是很直观并且需要实践,因此我们旨在确定在浇水任务期间提供的自动对焦是否可以自然地用作练习后的视觉反馈(VF)。为此,我们对有健康眼光的年轻受试者(n = 20)中出现的三个独立反馈(视觉,触觉,运动觉或听觉)的倒水性能和运动学进行了量化。在第一个,第五个或第十三个试验中,AF条件下的洒水重量与TKF条件之间没有显着差异。在TKF(p = 0.01)和AF(p = 0.001)的第一个和第十三个试验之间,使用TKF和AF的主观报告的难度明显降低。在第一次使用TKF进行试验时,躯干旋转明显低于使用VF时的躯干旋转。同样,在第一次试验中,使用TKF的肩关节内收明显高于使用VF的肩关节内收。在AF试验期间,水壶尖端的平均行程距离在第一次试验中显着减小,因此在第30次试验中,与使用TKF和VF的第30次试验中壶口的平均行程没有显着差异。对于每种“反馈”条件,水壶尖端的最大速度是恒定的,但使用VF在10 cm s(-1)中要比TKF高,在使用AF的10 cm s-1中要更高。 TKF和AF条件下运动的平滑度(由标准化的加加速度计(NJSM)表示)分别比VF高一个和两个数量级。然后,第五次试验使中位NJSM显着下降。通过运动捕捉和运动分类(例如液体倒入)监控内部活动可以通过AF协助日常活动。作为智能家居中的内置功能,此特定于任务的AF可以防止视力障碍的烧伤。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd和人体工程学学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号