首页> 外文期刊>Blood purification >Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.
【24h】

Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.

机译:通过部分透析液定量和在线尿素监测仪评估稀释前和稀释后在线血液透析滤过的充分性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On-line highflux hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a clinically interesting and effective mode of renal replacement therapy, which offers the possibility to obtain an increased removal of both small and large solutes. The fundamental role of urea kinetic monitoring to assess dialysis adequacy in conventional hemodialysis has been widely studied. Both direct measurement of the urea removed by the modified direct dialysate quantitation (mDDQ) based on partial dialysate collection (PDC) and dialysate-based urea kinetic modeling (DUKM) using urea monitor have been advocated. The validity of this assessment tool in the patients with on-line HDF remained unclear. The aims of this investigation were (1) to compare the delivered Kt/V, urea mass removal (UMR), solute removal index (SRI) and normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) between pre- and postdilutional high-flux HDF; (2) to verify and compare the efficiency of pre- and postdilutional HDF using DUKM with on-line dialysate urea sensor, and mDDQ with partial dialysate collection. During both mode of HDF, the paired analysis urea removed and Kt/V showed no significant difference. Using mDDQ, mean values for predilutional mode were as follows: Kt/V 1.53 +/- 0.01 UMR, 16.8 +/- 0.3 g/session; urea clearance 178 +/- 18 ml/min; SRI 75.5 +/- 7.7%; urea distribution volume (V) 28.3 +/- 1.2 liters; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.18 g/kg/day; on the other hand, mean values for postdilutional mode were Kt/V 1.58 +/- 0.01; UMR 17.10 +/- 0.28 g/session; urea clearance 184 +/- 21 ml/min; SRI 77.2 +/- 3.5%; urea distribution volume, 27.8 +/- 1.5 liters; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.19 g/kg/day. The mean value of urea generation rate was 5.82 +/- 1.12 mg/min during HDF. Our results showed that dialysis adequacy was achieved with both high-volume predilutional HDF and postdilutional HDF. These two modes of HDF provided similar and adequate small solute clearance. In addition, we found that on-line analysis of urea kinetics is a reliable tool for quantifying and assuring delivery of adequate dialysis.
机译:在线高通量血液透析滤过(HDF)是肾脏替代疗法的一种临床有趣且有效的模式,它提供了增加去除大大小小的溶质的可能性。尿素动力学监测在评估常规血液透析中透析充分性方面的基本作用已得到广泛研究。提倡通过基于部分透析液收集(PDC)的改进的直接透析液定量(mDDQ)直接测量尿素和使用尿素监测仪进行基于透析液的尿素动力学建模(DUKM)。该评估工具在HDF在线患者中的有效性尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是(1)比较稀释前和稀释后高通量HDF之间的递送的Kt / V,尿素质量去除率(UMR),溶质去除指数(SRI)和归一化蛋白质分解代谢率(nPCR); (2)验证和比较使用在线透析液尿素传感器的DUKM和使用部分透析液收集的mDDQ进行稀释前和稀释后HDF的效率。在两种HDF模式下,成对的分析尿素均已去除,Kt / V差异无统计学意义。使用mDDQ,稀释前模式的平均值如下:Kt / V 1.53 +/- 0.01 UMR,16.8 +/- 0.3 g /疗程;尿素清除率178 +/- 18 ml / min; SRI 75.5 +/- 7.7%;尿素分配量(V)28.3 +/- 1.2升; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.18 g / kg /天;另一方面,稀释后模式的平均值为Kt / V 1.58 +/- 0.01; UMR 17.10 +/- 0.28 g /会话;尿素清除率184 +/- 21 ml / min; SRI 77.2 +/- 3.5%;尿素分配量为27.8 +/- 1.5升; nPCR 1.34 +/- 0.19 g / kg /天。 HDF期间尿素生成率的平均值为5.82 +/- 1.12 mg / min。我们的结果表明,大容量稀释前HDF和稀释后HDF均可实现透析充分性。 HDF的这两种模式提供了相似且足够小的溶质清除率。此外,我们发现尿素动力学的在线分析是定量和确保充分透析的可靠工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号