首页> 外文期刊>Applied Geography >Geographers in the public square: A comparative analysis of op-ed productivity
【24h】

Geographers in the public square: A comparative analysis of op-ed productivity

机译:公共广场上的地理学家:op-op生产率的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper explores three questions. 1) How active are academics in the op-ed pages of American newspapers and how do geographers compare on this front? 2) Are there patterns that emerge among those geographers who have published commentaries in American newspapers in terms of their rank and gender? 3) Are there common themes or perspectives which emerge in the opinion pieces penned by geographers? These questions are answered by an analysis of newspaper op-eds published in the United States over the 2004-2008 period using the LexisNexis Academic database. Geography ranks sixth out of the seven disciplines measured in terms of the total number of op-eds published, yet fourth out of seven when the different sizes of disciplines are taken into account. Within geography, authors with the rank of full professor are the most likely to publish a commentary.
机译:本文探讨了三个问题。 1)学术界人士在美国报纸专着中的活跃程度如何?地理学家在这方面的比较情况如何? 2)那些在美国报纸上发表过评论的地理学家中,在等级和性别方面是否出现了格局? 3)地理学家撰写的意见书中是否出现共同的主题或观点?通过使用LexisNexis学术数据库对2004年至2008年期间在美国出版的报纸文章进行分析,可以回答这些问题。就发表的论文总数而言,地理学在七个学科中排名第六,但考虑到学科的不同规模,在七个学科中排名第四。在地理环境中,具有教授级职称的作家最有可能发表评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号