...
首页> 外文期刊>Angiology: the Journal of Vascular Diseases >Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Diabetics: A Matched Comparison of 6 Months' Outcome With Conventional Balloon Angioplasty
【24h】

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Diabetics: A Matched Comparison of 6 Months' Outcome With Conventional Balloon Angioplasty

机译:切割球囊血管成形术治疗糖尿病支架内再狭窄:6个月结果与常规球囊血管成形术的匹配比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ranging from 24% to 55%, angiographic in-stent restenosis (1SR) rates in diabetics are higher than the 17% to 28% rates observed in nondiabetics, There are controversies regarding optimal treatment for ISR. Recently, cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) emerged as a tool in management. The authors assessed the hypothesis that CBA has advantages over conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PICA) in treatment of ISR in diabetics. CBA or PTCA was applied to 165 diabetics (267 ISR lesions) in their institution. With a computer algorithm, an attempt was made to match each lesion in the CBA group with a corresponding lesion in the PTCA group. The lesion pairs should match with respect to the patients' age and gender, type of target vessel and stent, reference vessel diameter, and baseline minimal lumen diameter (MLD). Following the matching process, 55 ISR lesion pairs were identified. Baseline patient characteristics were similar among the groups (p = NS). There was no difference in the in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the groups, whereas MACE at follow up was significantly lower in the CBA group compared to the PTCA group (CBA, 20.0% vs PTCA, 43.6%, p<0.05). The recurrent ISR rate was significantly lower in the CBA group compared to the PTCA group (CBA, 27.3% vs PTCA, 49,1%; p<0.05). Also, a diffuse pattern of recurrence was more common in lesions treated with PTCA, whereas a focal pattern of recurrence was more common in the CBA group. The minimal luminal diameter at follow-up, the acute gain, and net gain were significantly higher in the group of lesions treated with CBA than in the PTCA group, In addition, a significantly higher late loss and loss index at follow-up were observed in the PTCA group compared to the CBA group. CBA has advantages over PTCA in treatment of diabetic patients with ISR, with better immediate and follow-up angiographic outcomes, and better follow-up clinical outcome.
机译:糖尿病患者的血管造影支架内再狭窄(1SR)率从24%到55%不等,高于非糖尿病患者中的17%至28%。ISR的最佳治疗存在争议。最近,切割球囊血管成形术(CBA)成为一种管理工具。作者评估了以下假设:在糖尿病患者的ISR治疗中,CBA优于常规的经皮经皮腔内球囊成形术(PICA)。 CBA或PTCA用于其机构中的165位糖尿病患者(267个ISR病变)。通过计算机算法,尝试将CBA组中的每个病变与PTCA组中的对应病变进行匹配。病变对应根据患者的年龄和性别,目标血管和支架的类型,参考血管直径以及基线最小管腔直径(MLD)进行匹配。在匹配过程之后,确定了55个ISR病变对。各组之间的基线患者特征相似(p = NS)。两组之间的院内主要不良心脏事件(MACE)没有差异,而CBA组的随访时MACE明显低于PTCA组(CBA,20.0%,而PTCA,43.6%,p < 0.05)。与PTCA组相比,CBA组的复发ISR率显着降低(CBA为27.3%,而PTCA为49,1%; p <0.05)。同样,在PTCA治疗的病变中,弥漫性复发模式更为常见,而在CBA组中,局灶性复发模式更为常见。 CBA治疗的病变组的随访时最小管腔直径,急性增重和净增值均明显高于PTCA组。此外,观察到的晚期丢失和丢失指数也明显更高PTCA组与CBA组相比。 CBA在治疗ISR糖尿病患者方面优于PTCA,具有更好的即时和后续血管造影结果,以及更好的后续临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号